Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Tribunal allows appeal, recognizes business commencement in 2016-17</h1> The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, deleting the disallowance of the business loss and implicitly recognizing the commencement of business ... Disallowance of business loss - assessee is still in the process of setting up of business and therefore the business of the assessee has not β€œcommenced” during the year - HELD THAT:- As perused the relevant records especially the documentary evidences filed by the assessee alongwitth the decision of the ITAT, Delhi β€˜B’ Bench in the csse of ITO vs. Amrit Foods (P) Ltd. [1984 (3) TMI 150 - ITAT DELHI-B] the assessee has commenced its business in the said assessment year as the assessee had made its sale and purchase i.e. Harpic which is evident from the table below which has already been mentioned in the written submissions. It is well settled law that even a single transaction may constitute business as defined in section 2(13). It is not asking there should be a series of transaction. Both of purchase and the sale to constitute trade. Therefore, we delete the addition in dispute. - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction of the CIT(A).2. Determination of the commencement of business.3. Disallowance of business loss claim.4. Classification of interest and miscellaneous income.5. Disallowance of carry forward of loss under Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Jurisdiction of the CIT(A):The Assessee challenged the jurisdiction of the CIT(A), claiming the order dated 17.12.2018 was 'without jurisdiction, illegal, bad in law and void ab initio.' However, this issue was not elaborated upon in the judgment, suggesting it was not the primary focus of the Tribunal's decision.2. Determination of the Commencement of Business:The Assessee argued that its business had commenced during the assessment year 2016-17, evidenced by the purchase and sale of goods (Harpic) in May 2015. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) contended that the business had not commenced as there were no significant business transactions beyond the initial purchase and sale. The Tribunal, however, found that even a single transaction could constitute 'business' as defined in section 2(13) of the Income Tax Act, citing the ITAT Delhi decision in ITO vs. Amrit Foods (P) Ltd. The Tribunal concluded that the Assessee had commenced its business during the relevant assessment year.3. Disallowance of Business Loss Claim:The AO disallowed the business loss claimed by the Assessee, arguing that the expenses were related to activities prior to the commencement of business. The Tribunal disagreed, noting that the Assessee had made purchases and sales, thereby commencing business operations. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance of the business loss.4. Classification of Interest and Miscellaneous Income:The AO classified the Assessee's interest and miscellaneous income of Rs. 1,21,659/- under 'income from other sources,' rather than as part of the business profits. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail, but by recognizing the commencement of business, it implicitly accepted that such income could be considered as part of the business income.5. Disallowance of Carry Forward of Loss under Section 79:The AO invoked Section 79 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to disallow the carry forward of loss. The Tribunal's recognition of the Assessee's business commencement and the deletion of the disallowance of business loss rendered this issue academic, and it was not adjudicated separately.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, deleting the disallowance of the business loss and implicitly recognizing the commencement of business operations during the assessment year 2016-17. The decision emphasized that even a single transaction could constitute business, aligning with the precedent set in ITO vs. Amrit Foods (P) Ltd. The other grounds raised by the Assessee were deemed academic and were not adjudicated. The decision was pronounced on 07.01.2021.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found