TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal orders reactivation of directors' DIN numbers under Companies Act, 2013</h1> <h3>Stepson Web Consultancy Services Private Limited Versus The Registrar of Companies, Kerala & Lakshadweep</h3> Stepson Web Consultancy Services Private Limited Versus The Registrar of Companies, Kerala & Lakshadweep - [2021] 224 Comp Cas 601 (NCLT–Kochi) Issues:1. Restoration of company's status and activation of DIN numbers.2. Disqualification of directors under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.3. Interpretation of Rule 8 of Director Identification Number Rules, 2006 and Rule 11 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualifications of Directors) Rules, 2014.4. Authority of the Registrar of Companies to deactivate DIN.5. Tribunal's jurisdiction to enforce orders.Analysis:1. The Tribunal had previously issued directions for the restoration of the company's status and activation of DIN numbers, which included filing statutory documents and paying costs to the government. The company complied with these directions, but the Registrar of Companies (RoC) refused to allow uploading of defaulted documents due to directors' disqualification under Section 164(2) of the Act.2. The Applicant argued that the disqualification did not apply as the directors were permanent and not holding directorship in any other company. The Applicant contended that Rule 8 and Rule 11 of the relevant rules did not empower the RoC to cancel or deactivate DIN for director disqualification. The Tribunal noted the absence of RoC's reply and proceeded to decide the matter.3. The learned counsel referred to relevant judgments to argue that the RoC could only deactivate DIN by following the Rules. After considering the submissions and judgments, the Tribunal concluded that reactivating the DIN numbers of the directors was necessary for the company to file required documents under the Companies Act, 2013.4. The Tribunal ordered the RoC to reactivate the DIN numbers of the directors, subject to any fines or penalties for the lapse. The company was directed to file all statutory documents within 30 days of reactivation. The RoC was instructed to update system records accordingly and take appropriate actions for any other violations committed.5. The Tribunal relied on Section 424(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 to enforce its order, emphasizing the RoC's duty to comply with the directions given. The judgment clarified that it was specific to the violations leading to DIN deactivation and did not prevent the RoC from taking further actions as per the law.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the issues involved, the arguments presented, and the Tribunal's decision, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the legal aspects and implications discussed in the case.
TaxTMI 