Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (12) TMI 568 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court remands case for further review, directs submission of documents and bank details The High Court remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for further review. The court directed the assessees to provide all necessary ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            High Court remands case for further review, directs submission of documents and bank details

                            The High Court remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for further review. The court directed the assessees to provide all necessary documentation, including books of accounts, and instructed ICICI Bank to furnish details of the loan transaction. The Assessing Officer was tasked with reevaluating the taxability of the loan waiver, deduction of bad debts, allowance of preoperative expenses, and depreciation on assets based on the complete documentation. Failure to comply within one month would result in the confirmation of the Tribunal's decision and dismissal of the appeals.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Taxability of loan waiver under Section 28(iv) and Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Deduction of bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2).
                            3. Allowance of preoperative expenses.
                            4. Depreciation on machinery and other assets.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Taxability of Loan Waiver:
                            The primary issue was whether the waiver of the loan by ICICI Bank should be taxed as income under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The assessees argued that the loan waiver was a capital receipt and not taxable. They relied on the Supreme Court's decision in CIT Vs. Mahindra and Mahindra Limited, which held that waiver of a loan by the bank is not taxable under Section 28(iv) or Section 41(1) as it is not a trading liability.

                            The Tribunal, however, based its decision on earlier judgments, including Ramaniyam Homes (P) Ltd. and Iskraemeco Regent Ltd., which held that the loan waiver should be treated as a revenue receipt and thus taxable. The Tribunal noted that the assessees did not provide sufficient documentation or books of accounts to substantiate their claim. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the Assessing Officer's decision to treat the loan waiver as taxable income.

                            2. Deduction of Bad Debts:
                            The assessees claimed deductions for bad debts written off. The Assessing Officer disallowed these claims, stating that the assessees failed to provide sufficient evidence that the debts were actually written off and met the conditions laid down under Section 36(1)(vii) read with Section 36(2). The CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal upheld this disallowance, noting that the assessees could not furnish account copies of the creditors or proof of steps taken for debt recovery.

                            3. Allowance of Preoperative Expenses:
                            In the case of M/s. Kothari Biotech Ltd., the assessees claimed preoperative expenses. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, stating that the business had not commenced its operations during the relevant assessment year. The CIT (Appeals) and the Tribunal confirmed this disallowance, noting that the business was suspended, and no manufacturing activity was undertaken. The expenses could not be allowed as they were not capitalized nor any depreciation claimed.

                            4. Depreciation on Machinery and Other Assets:
                            The assessees claimed depreciation on machinery and other assets. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, stating that there were no business operations during the relevant financial year, and the assets were not put to use. The CIT (Appeals) allowed the depreciation claim, following the ITAT's decision in Kothari Sugars & Chemicals Ltd., which held that depreciation should be allowed on the block of assets even if they were not used in the subsequent years. The Tribunal did not address this issue further as no appeal was filed by the Revenue.

                            Conclusion:
                            The High Court remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer, directing the assessees to submit all relevant particulars, including books of accounts for the year 2003-2004 and previous years, and for the ICICI Bank to provide details of the loan transaction. The Assessing Officer was instructed to reconsider the issues based on the complete documentation and pass orders in accordance with the law. If the assessees fail to submit the required particulars within one month, the Tribunal's order will stand confirmed, and the appeals will be dismissed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found