Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 221(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable when the assessee had filed a return declaring nil income, claimed deduction under section 80P, and the quantum addition had been deleted in appeal.
Analysis: The return disclosed nil income and, on that basis, there was no occasion for payment of self-assessment tax. The assessment had originally denied the deduction under section 80P and consequent tax liability, but the appellate authority allowed the deduction in quantum proceedings. Once the quantum addition was deleted and the returned income remained nil, the basis for treating the assessee as being in default for non-payment of self-assessment tax disappeared. In such circumstances, the penalty could not survive.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 221(1) was unsustainable and was deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for default in payment of self-assessment tax cannot be sustained where the assessee's returned income is nil and the very tax liability giving rise to the penalty is negated by the deletion of the quantum addition.