Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 could be denied on the ground that the pending appeal was before the Textile Committee (Cess) Tribunal, and whether the expression "Appellate Forum" in section 121(f) of the Scheme was confined to specified forums.
Analysis: The Court noticed the objection that the pending appeal before the Textile Committee (Cess) Tribunal was not covered by the definition of "Appellate Forum". It also noticed the scheme provisions relied upon, namely sections 121(f), 122 and 123(a), and recorded a prima facie view that the term "Appellate Forum" might be understood more broadly than the narrow construction suggested in the rejection.
Outcome: Notice was issued to the respondents for further consideration.