Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (12) TMI 447 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Entitlement to 15% Exemption Confirmed, Allowing Deficit Carry Forward for Future Set Offs u/s 11(1)(a. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to the 15% exemption under Section 11(1)(a) for accumulation. It confirmed that the deficit should be ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Entitlement to 15% Exemption Confirmed, Allowing Deficit Carry Forward for Future Set Offs u/s 11(1)(a.

                          The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to the 15% exemption under Section 11(1)(a) for accumulation. It confirmed that the deficit should be computed after allowing this deduction and permitted the carry forward of the deficit for set off in subsequent years. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed, and the AO was directed to implement the benefits as determined.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption under Section 11(1)(a) for the 15% of gross income towards accumulation as a standard deduction.
                          2. Whether the deficit being excess of expenditure over income needs to be worked out after reducing the said standard deduction.
                          3. Whether the carry forward of the deficit of excess expenditure over income is permissible for set off in subsequent years.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          Issue 1: Exemption under Section 11(1)(a) for 15% of Gross Income
                          The Tribunal examined whether the assessee is entitled to the exemption under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which allows for 15% of gross income to be accumulated as a standard deduction. The assessee, a Section 25 company and a public charitable trust, had applied more for charitable purposes than its gross income. The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Co-ordinate Bench of Ahmedabad Tribunal in the case of ITO vs. Utthan Sewa Sansthan, which clarified that the general accumulation of 15% under Section 11(1)(a) is not subject to any conditions and is unfettered. The Tribunal upheld that the assessee is entitled to this exemption, supporting the view that the 15% accumulation is allowable regardless of whether the income has been fully applied or not.

                          Issue 2: Deficit Computation After Standard Deduction
                          The Tribunal addressed whether the deficit, being the excess of expenditure over income, should be calculated after reducing the 15% standard deduction. The Tribunal confirmed that the deficit should indeed be computed after allowing the 15% deduction. This position was reinforced by the decisions in the assessee's own case for previous assessment years and other similar cases, such as the Lalji Velji Charitable Trust vs. ITO, where it was held that even in the case of a deficit, the 15% accumulation is allowable.

                          Issue 3: Carry Forward of Deficit for Set Off in Subsequent Years
                          The Tribunal also examined whether the deficit (excess expenditure over income) can be carried forward for set off in subsequent years. The Tribunal referred to several judicial precedents, including the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court's decision in CIT vs. Shri Plot Shwetambar Murtipujak Jain Mandal, which established that the income applied for charitable purposes in earlier years can be adjusted against the income of subsequent years. This principle was upheld by the Tribunal, allowing the assessee to carry forward the deficit for future set off. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the carry forward of the deficit, aligning with the benevolent provisions of Section 11.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that:
                          1. The assessee is entitled to the 15% exemption under Section 11(1)(a) for accumulation.
                          2. The deficit should be computed after allowing the 15% standard deduction.
                          3. The deficit can be carried forward for set off in subsequent years.

                          The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Tribunal upheld the computation of income made by the assessee, directing the AO to allow the benefits accordingly. The order was pronounced on 10/12/2020.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found