TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeal citing CBDT Circulars; application under Income Tax Act rejected.</h1> <h3>DCIT, Circle-01, Kota Versus Sh. Bharat Kothari</h3> DCIT, Circle-01, Kota Versus Sh. Bharat Kothari - TMI Issues:1. Interpretation of CBDT Circulars regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.2. Application of special order exempting cases involving bogus LTCG/STCL through penny stocks from monetary limits.3. Consideration of CBDT Circular no. 23 of 2019 and special order dated 16.09.2019 in pending appeals.4. Rectification under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Issue 1: Interpretation of CBDT Circulars regarding monetary limits for filing appealsThe Revenue filed a miscellaneous application against the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench in ITA No. 156/JP/2019, contending that the Tribunal did not appreciate the findings of the AO regarding accommodation entry of Rs. 1,16,15,493 in the form of LTCG. The Revenue argued that despite the tax effect being below the limit prescribed by the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 for filing appeals, the order should be recalled based on the exception to monetary limits specified in CBDT Circular No. 23 of 2019. The Revenue relied on the decision of the Ahmedabad Benches of the Tribunal in similar cases to support its position.Issue 2: Application of special order exempting cases involving bogus LTCG/STCL through penny stocks from monetary limitsThe AR argued that the Tribunal decided the appeal in favor of the assessee based on the CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019, which increased the monetary limit for maintaining departmental appeals to Rs. 50.00 Lacs. The AR emphasized that the appeal was disposed of before the issuance of CBDT Circular no. 23 of 2019, which exempted penny stock cases from monetary limits. Citing a similar case decided by the Jaipur Benches of the Tribunal, the AR contended that the misc. application should be dismissed as the matter was already decided based on the existing circular at the time of the appeal.Issue 3: Consideration of CBDT Circular no. 23 of 2019 and special order dated 16.09.2019 in pending appealsThe Tribunal referred to CBDT Circular no. 23 of 2019 and the special order dated 16.09.2019, emphasizing that a special order is required for appeals in cases involving organized tax evasion through penny stocks. It was clarified that the special order exempts cases from monetary limits for filing appeals. The Tribunal held that the appeal, filed before the issuance of the special order, did not fall under the exception prescribed by the CBDT Circulars and was rightly dismissed based on the existing circular at the time of the appeal.Issue 4: Rectification under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961The Tribunal concluded that the CBDT Circular no. 23 of 2019 and the special order dated 16.09.2019 were not part of the record at the time of hearing or passing the order on the appeal. Therefore, the non-consideration of these subsequent circulars and special orders did not constitute a mistake apparent from the record that could be rectified under section 254(2) of the Act. The miscellaneous application filed by the Revenue was deemed not maintainable and dismissed accordingly.This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues involved and the Tribunal's interpretation of the CBDT Circulars and special orders in determining the outcome of the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
