Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules on interest imputation for outstanding receivables in associated enterprises sale.</h1> <h3>Hexagon Capability Center India Private Limited Versus The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2 (2)</h3> The Tribunal held that outstanding receivables related to the sale of services to associated enterprises did not require a separate adjustment for ... TP adjustment - imputing interest on outstanding receivables as on March 31st 2013 relating to sales of services to AE's - HELD THAT:- Outstanding receivable is a separate international transaction and requires to be benchmarked post amendment in Clause (c) of Explanation to Section 92B of the Act by the Finance Act, 2012. However, since in the instant case, the working capital adjustments had been granted by the ld. TPO, on which fact there is absolutely no dispute, the outstanding receivables thereon gets subsumed thereon. Hence, there is no need to make separate adjustment towards outstanding receivables by imputation of interest on the same. This aspect has been considered in assessee's own case for A.Y₹ 2011-12 and 2012-13 [2018 (6) TMI 508 - ITAT HYDERABAD] - we direct the ld. TPO not to make any adjustment by way of imputation of interest on outstanding receivables in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the instant case. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed in this regard. Issues:1. Whether outstanding receivables could be considered as a separate international transaction and imputation of interest thereon could be madeRs.2. Whether separate adjustment to arm's length price of outstanding receivables could be made, if working capital adjustment is granted to the assesseeRs.Analysis:Issue 1:The appeal in ITA No. 2032/Hyd/2017 for A.Y. 2013-14 pertained to the consideration of outstanding receivables as a separate international transaction and the imputation of interest thereon. The Tribunal considered the contentions of the assessee and the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) regarding the nature of outstanding receivables related to the sale of services to associated enterprises (AEs). The TPO proposed to charge interest on the receivables, which the assessee contested, arguing that the outstanding receivables were part of the Working Capital Adjustment (WCA) computation and that interest was already factored into the arm's length margin. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) held that deferred receivables constituted an international transaction and directed the Assessing Officer to apply short-term fixed deposit rates for the interest adjustment. The Tribunal, considering past judgments and the working capital adjustments granted by the TPO, held that outstanding receivables did not require a separate adjustment for imputation of interest, as it was subsumed within the working capital adjustments.Issue 2:The second issue revolved around whether a separate adjustment to the arm's length price of outstanding receivables could be made if working capital adjustment was granted to the assessee. The Tribunal referred to its previous order for A.Yrs. 2011-12 and 2012-13, where it was held that working capital adjustment accounted for interest on receivables, eliminating the need for further adjustments. Citing relevant case laws and the decision of the High Court, the Tribunal directed the TPO not to make any adjustment by imputing interest on outstanding receivables in the present case. Consequently, the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed in this regard.Other Grounds:Ground No. 3 raised by the assessee pertained to the charging of interest u/s. 234D, deemed consequential in nature. Ground No. 4 related to the initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) and 271AA, deemed premature for adjudication at that stage. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee based on the detailed analysis and findings on the primary issues discussed.This comprehensive analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal arguments, interpretations of relevant provisions, and the Tribunal's decision on each issue presented in the appeal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found