Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether detention of goods in transit was unjustified when one segment of transportation was not covered by a valid e-way bill, and whether the goods could be cleared against a bank guarantee pending adjudication.
Analysis: The notice under Form GST-MOV-07 disclosed a defect in that a segment of the transport was not supported by a valid e-way bill. On that basis, the detention was not held to be unjustified. At the same time, the petitioner's request for interim clearance was accepted by directing release of the goods on furnishing a bank guarantee for the amount demanded, with the respondents to proceed to final adjudication under Section 129(3) of the GST Act.
Conclusion: The detention was upheld, but interim release of the goods against a bank guarantee was ed pending final adjudication.