Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Delhi HC allows petitioner's transitional tax credit, challenges CGST Rules. Counter-affidavit awaited.</h1> The Delhi HC ordered to allow the petitioner to carry forward transitional tax credit of Rs. 14,50,716 in its electronic credit ledger, challenging the ... Carry forward in its electronic credit ledger the transitional tax credit - Vires of Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 as ultra vires of Sections 140 and 174 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - validity of retrospective amendment made in Section 140(1) w.e.f. 01st July, 2017 - HELD THAT:- Issue notice. The Delhi High Court ordered to allow the petitioner to carry forward transitional tax credit of Rs. 14,50,716 in its electronic credit ledger. The petitioner challenged the validity of Rule 117 of CGST Rules, 2017 and a retrospective amendment in Section 140(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Respondent was given time to file a counter-affidavit, and the case was listed for further hearing on 14th December, 2020.