Case on Cenvat Credit Refund Post-GST Remanded for Supreme Court Decision

The Tribunal remanded the case regarding the refund of accumulated unutilized Cenvat Credit post-GST implementation to the Adjudicating Authority, awaiting the Supreme Court's decision in a related case. The conflicting precedents and the pending challenge of the Bombay High Court's Larger Bench judgment led the Tribunal to set aside the previous order and defer a final decision until the Supreme Court's ruling in BOMBAY DYEING & MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. V/s. CCE.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Refund of accumulated unutilized Cenvat Credit of Krishi Kalyan Cess post-GST implementation.

Analysis:
1. The appellant claimed a refund of accumulated unutilized Cenvat Credit due to GST implementation. Citing various judgments, the appellant argued in favor of the refund, including the Gujarat High Court's decision in M/s. ISHAN COPPER PVT. LTD.

2. The revenue, represented by the Superintendent, opposed the refund, relying on judgments such as CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and M/s. GAURIPLASTICULTURE PVT LTD. The revenue highlighted the decision of the Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court, which held that refund of unutilized credit is not permissible without a statutory provision.

3. The Tribunal noted conflicting judgments, including those of its Larger Benches in the cases of M/s. Gauri Plasticulture Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Steel Strips. The Tribunal acknowledged high court decisions from Karnataka, Rajasthan, and Bombay on similar issues.

4. Considering the conflicting precedents and the pending challenge of the Bombay High Court's Larger Bench judgment in the Supreme Court, the Tribunal decided to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal deemed it appropriate to await the Supreme Court's decision in the case of BOMBAY DYEING & MANUFACTURING CO. LTD. V/s. CCE before making a final determination.

5. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority, pending the Supreme Court's decision, as pronounced on 29.10.2020.

---