Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court questions legality of Garnishee Notice, grants interim stay pending review.</h1> The High Court directed the respondents to show cause regarding the legality of a Garnishee Notice challenged by the petitioner. The Court noted ... Validity of Garnishee Notice - principles of natural justice - violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and 265 of Constitution of India or not - HELD THAT:- As seen from the record, prima facie, it appears that even before the statutory period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired, garnishee notice dated 26.08.2020 came to be passed for recovery of tax for the period from January, 2020 to June, 2020; January, 2019 to December, 2019. It is to be noted here that against the assessment order dated 13.08.2020, an appeal lies under section 117 of the central Goods and Service tax Act and the time prescribed for filing the appeal is three months. Even before the expiry of the said period, the Garnishee notice came to be passed. Insofar as the period of recovery from January, 2019 to December, 2019 is concerned, it appears form the record that notice was given on 28.07.2020 intimating the discrepancies in the Returns after scrutiny and the petitioner has to furnish reasons for the discrepancies on or before 27.08.2020. but, though the time expires on 27.08.2020 garnishee Notice came to be passed on 26.08.2020. List the matter on 02.09.2020. Issues:1. Challenge to the legality of Garnishee Notice issued by the 1st respondent.2. Request for issuance of a writ of mandamus.3. Allegations of illegality, arbitrariness, and violation of principles of natural justice.4. Violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 265 of the Constitution of India.5. Stay application for Garnishee Notice pending disposal of the writ petition.Analysis:1. The petitioner challenged the legality of the Garnishee Notice issued by the 1st respondent, alleging it to be illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice. The petitioner sought the issuance of a writ of mandamus to declare the impugned notice as without authority of law and in violation of constitutional provisions.2. The High Court, upon perusing the petition and affidavit, directed the issuance of a notice to the respondents to show cause as to why the writ petition should not be admitted. The respondents, including tax authorities and a bank, were directed to appear and respond to the allegations raised by the petitioner.3. The Court noted that the Garnishee Notice was issued before the statutory period of limitation for filing an appeal had expired. It highlighted discrepancies in the notice issuance timeline concerning the recovery periods mentioned in the notice. The Court observed that the notice was issued prematurely, even before the petitioner had the opportunity to address the discrepancies.4. Regarding the period of recovery from January 2019 to December 2019, the Court found that the notice was issued before the petitioner could furnish reasons for the discrepancies highlighted in the returns. The Court noted the premature issuance of the notice before the expiration of the deadline provided to the petitioner for responding to the identified discrepancies.5. In response to the stay application for the Garnishee Notice pending disposal of the writ petition, the Court granted an interim stay of the notice's operation for a limited period. The Court scheduled the matter for further hearing along with a connected writ petition, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive review of the issues raised by the petitioner.This detailed analysis outlines the key issues raised in the legal judgment, focusing on the challenge to the Garnishee Notice's legality, the request for a writ of mandamus, and the Court's decision regarding the stay application pending the disposal of the writ petition.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found