Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court upholds rejection of P5 licence application for ammonium nitrate import; appeal dismissed on national security grounds.</h1> <h3>M/s. Sri Amman Chemicals Versus The Additional Secretary & Appellate Authority, The Chief Controller of Explosives Petroleum & Explosives Safety Organization, The Commissioner of Customs, The Additional Commissioner of Customs (SIIB)</h3> M/s. Sri Amman Chemicals Versus The Additional Secretary & Appellate Authority, The Chief Controller of Explosives Petroleum & Explosives Safety ... Issues Involved:1. Entitlement to import ammonium nitrate.2. Validity of rejection of P5 licence application on the ground that the appellant is a trader.3. Compliance with the Ammonium Nitrate Rules and the Explosives Act.4. Detention and auction of imported ammonium nitrate by Customs authorities.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Entitlement to Import Ammonium Nitrate:The appellant's entitlement to import ammonium nitrate was examined under the Ammonium Nitrate Rules, 2012, which came into force on 11.07.2012. Rule 6(4)(a) explicitly prohibits the import of ammonium nitrate without a licence: 'No person shall import or export any Ammonium Nitrate except under and in accordance with the conditions of license granted under these rules.' The appellant's application for a P5 licence was rejected on 19.08.2015, and despite this, the appellant imported 740 MT of ammonium nitrate on 24.09.2015, violating Rule 6(4)(a). The court concluded that the appellant was not entitled to import ammonium nitrate without a valid licence, and the subsequent detention and auction by Customs authorities were justified.2. Validity of Rejection of P5 Licence Application:The rejection of the P5 licence application was based on the appellant being a trader, with the authorities asserting that national security concerns necessitate restricting the import of ammonium nitrate to users and not traders. The court noted that while the Ammonium Nitrate Rules do not explicitly prohibit the grant of licences to traders, considerable discretion is vested in the Licensing Authority under Rules 34 and 35. The court found that the Licensing Authority's decision to reject the application was consistent with the national security policy, which aims to prevent the unregulated distribution of ammonium nitrate, an explosive substance.3. Compliance with the Ammonium Nitrate Rules and the Explosives Act:The court examined Rule 5, which allows existing importers to apply for a licence within six months and comply with the Rules within one year from the date of publication. However, since the appellant's application was rejected, the appellant could not rely on this transitional provision. Furthermore, the court noted that ammonium nitrate is classified as an explosive under Section 17 of the Explosives Act, and the appellant's actions were in violation of both the Ammonium Nitrate Rules and the Explosives Act.4. Detention and Auction of Imported Ammonium Nitrate by Customs Authorities:The appellant's import of ammonium nitrate without a valid licence led to the detention of the consignment by Customs authorities. The court found that this action was in compliance with the Customs Act, 1962, which prohibits the import of goods without adhering to relevant restrictions and prohibitions. The subsequent auction of the detained goods was also deemed lawful, given the appellant's violation of import regulations.Conclusion:The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the rejection of the P5 licence application and the actions taken by Customs authorities. The court found that the appellant's import of ammonium nitrate without a valid licence was in violation of the Ammonium Nitrate Rules and the Explosives Act, and that the rejection of the licence application on national security grounds was justified. The court also noted that the learned single Judge had duly considered all relevant provisions and documents before rejecting the writ petition, and thus, no interference with the impugned order was warranted. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found