Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Law of Competition

        2020 (10) TMI 397 - Tri - Law of Competition

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Approves Business Merger, Still Requires Compliance with Laws and Payment of Taxes and Fees. The Tribunal sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation, effective from April 1, 2019, subject to compliance with statutory requirements and addressing ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal Approves Business Merger, Still Requires Compliance with Laws and Payment of Taxes and Fees.

                              The Tribunal sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation, effective from April 1, 2019, subject to compliance with statutory requirements and addressing observations from statutory authorities. The Tribunal clarified that the sanctioning did not exempt the parties from paying stamp duty, taxes, or other charges, and mandated compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The petitioner companies were directed to ensure adherence to the Companies Act, 2013, and to submit quarterly and annual compliance reports. The petition was disposed of with specific directions and conditions outlined for the amalgamation.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013.
                              2. Compliance with statutory requirements and observations from statutory authorities.
                              3. Financial and accounting treatment of the amalgamation.
                              4. Compliance with CSR obligations.
                              5. Pending tax liabilities and legal proceedings.
                              6. Compliance with FEMA/RBI regulations.
                              7. Transfer of liabilities, including taxes and charges.
                              8. Compounding of offences/defaults under the Companies Act, 2013.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Sanctioning the Scheme of Amalgamation:
                              The petitioners sought the Tribunal's sanction for the scheme of amalgamation of four transferor companies with the transferee company under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal noted that the scheme was approved by the boards of the petitioner companies and was aimed at achieving greater focus on core businesses, better performance management, and consolidation of similar business operations.

                              2. Compliance with Statutory Requirements and Observations from Statutory Authorities:
                              The Tribunal directed the issuance of notices to various statutory authorities, including the Registrar of Companies, Income-tax Authority, and the Reserve Bank of India. The Registrar of Companies and the Regional Director provided observations, which included compliance with FEMA/RBI regulations, non-compliance with section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, and CSR spending. The petitioner companies responded to these observations, confirming compliance with necessary regulations and addressing issues related to CSR and tax liabilities.

                              3. Financial and Accounting Treatment of the Amalgamation:
                              The petitioner companies provided a certificate from S. R. Batliboi and Associates LLP, chartered accountants, confirming that the accounting treatment proposed in the scheme of amalgamation was in conformity with the Accounting Standard under section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme also outlined the share exchange ratios for the amalgamation.

                              4. Compliance with CSR Obligations:
                              The Registrar of Companies observed that the transferor company No. 3 had unspent CSR amounts for the financial years 2016-17 and 2017-18. The petitioner companies explained that the unspent amounts were carried forward for future projects and undertook to spend the unspent CSR amount post-merger as per section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013.

                              5. Pending Tax Liabilities and Legal Proceedings:
                              The Registrar of Companies noted pending tax demands and legal proceedings against the petitioner companies. The petitioner companies undertook to pay all undisputed outstanding tax demands once the matter reached finality. The Tribunal emphasized that the tax implications arising out of the scheme were subject to the final decision of the concerned Income-tax authorities.

                              6. Compliance with FEMA/RBI Regulations:
                              The petitioner companies confirmed compliance with FEMA/RBI regulations, stating that 100% foreign direct investment was allowed under the automatic route for the transferee company and transferor company No. 3. They also confirmed that there were no pending proceedings with the RBI.

                              7. Transfer of Liabilities, Including Taxes and Charges:
                              The Tribunal ordered that all liabilities, including taxes and charges of the transferor companies, be transferred to the transferee company without further act or deed, pursuant to section 232 of the Companies Act, 2013.

                              8. Compounding of Offences/Defaults under the Companies Act, 2013:
                              The Registrar of Companies noted non-compliance with section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, for the financial year 2016-17 by transferor company No. 3. The petitioner companies confirmed that the offence had been compounded and the penalty paid.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation, effective from April 1, 2019, subject to compliance with all statutory requirements and addressing the observations of the statutory authorities. The Tribunal emphasized that the sanctioning of the scheme should not be construed as an exemption from payment of stamp duty, taxes, or other charges and that compliance with all applicable laws and regulations was mandatory. The petitioner companies were directed to ensure compliance with all provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and to submit quarterly/annual status of compliances. The petition was disposed of with the Tribunal's order outlining the specific directions and conditions for the amalgamation.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found