Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corporate debtor should be sent into liquidation under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and whether a liquidator should be appointed.
Analysis: The resolution process had failed to yield an approved resolution plan. The committee of creditors, with full voting support, resolved to initiate liquidation and approved the resolution professional's appointment as liquidator. In these circumstances, the statutory preconditions for liquidation stood satisfied.
Conclusion: Liquidation of the corporate debtor was ordered and the resolution professional was appointed as liquidator.
Final Conclusion: The insolvency resolution process was brought to an end by directing liquidation under the Code, with consequential directions regarding cessation of moratorium and conduct of the liquidation process.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no compliant resolution plan is approved and the committee of creditors authorises liquidation, the adjudicating authority may order liquidation under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and appoint a liquidator in accordance with the Code and the liquidation regulations.