Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>GST Council's 12% Rate for Specialized Fabrics Upheld, Petition for Uniform 5% Rate Dismissed</h1> <h3>Manufacturers Traders Association & Anr. Versus Union Of India & Ors.</h3> Manufacturers Traders Association & Anr. Versus Union Of India & Ors. - 2020 (43) G. S. T. L. 616 (Del.) , [2022] 102 G S.T.R. 180 (Del) Issues Involved:1. Early hearing of the petition through video conferencing.2. Notification of GST rate of 5% for all varieties of fabrics under Chapters 50 to 63 of the Customs Tariff.3. Alleged conflict between GST notifications and GST Council recommendations.4. Examination of GST Council’s decision on tax rates for fabrics.Detailed Analysis:1. Early Hearing of the Petition through Video Conferencing:The petitioners sought an early hearing of the petition via video conferencing. The court allowed the application as there was no objection from the respondents. The application was disposed of accordingly, and the court proceeded to hear the main petition for final disposal.2. Notification of GST Rate of 5% for All Varieties of Fabrics:The petitioners, a society of fabric manufacturers, invoked the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Central Government and the Government of NCT of Delhi to notify the GST rate of 5% for all varieties of fabrics under Chapters 50 to 63 of the Customs Tariff, as recommended by the GST Council.3. Alleged Conflict Between GST Notifications and GST Council Recommendations:The petitioners contended that three GST notifications issued by the Central and State Governments conflicted with the GST Council’s recommendations. They argued that the Council had decided on a uniform GST rate of 5% for all fabrics, but the notifications set different rates, including 12% for certain fabrics under Chapters 56 to 59.4. Examination of GST Council’s Decision on Tax Rates for Fabrics:During preliminary hearings, the court referred the matter to the GST Council to clarify its stance. The GST Council, in its 38th meeting, confirmed that it had recommended a 12% GST rate for specialized and industrial fabrics under Chapters 56 to 59, while a 5% rate was recommended for other fabrics.The court noted that the GST Council’s minutes from its 15th meeting indicated a discussion on tax rates, but the final decision included a 12% rate for certain specialized fabrics. The Council reiterated this in its 38th meeting, confirming that the 12% rate was correctly notified.The petitioners argued that the Council’s recommendation was for a uniform 5% rate, but the court found no merit in this contention. The court emphasized that the GST Council, a constitutional body, had the authority to recommend tax rates and that its decisions were based on collaborative efforts embodying cooperative federalism.The court concluded that the GST Council’s recommendation of a 12% rate for specialized fabrics was valid and that the notifications were in line with these recommendations. The petition was dismissed, and the pending application was disposed of.Conclusion:The court upheld the GST Council’s recommendation of a 12% GST rate for specialized fabrics under Chapters 56 to 59 and dismissed the petition seeking a uniform 5% rate for all fabrics. The decision emphasized the authority of the GST Council in determining tax rates and the collaborative nature of its functioning.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found