Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the fourth bail application deserved to be allowed in view of the maximum punishment, length of custody, stage of trial, and parity with the co-accused.
Analysis: The application was considered against the background that the alleged offence under the GST law carried a maximum sentence of five years, the petitioner had remained in custody for about 19 months, the case was still at the stage of pre-charge evidence, and only two witnesses had been examined out of fourteen. The circumstance that a co-accused had already been granted bail was also taken into account, along with the admissions regarding recovery of part of the alleged amount.
Conclusion: The fourth bail application was allowed and bail was granted, subject to the conditions imposed by the Court.