Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payments made to a non-resident for liaison, procurement of orders and incidental services constituted fees for technical services liable to tax deduction at source under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The agreement and invoices described the services as consulting, project work procurement and similar tasks, but the actual material showed that the non-resident acted only as a liaison and procurement agent. The non-resident certified that it had not rendered technical or managerial services and had merely interfaced to obtain orders, while the assessee carried out the software services itself through its own network access. On these facts, the payments were held to be commission and reimbursement of incidental expenses for procuring orders, not consideration for managerial, technical or consultancy services within section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In the absence of technical services and with no permanent establishment or business connection in India, the amounts were not chargeable to tax in India and section 195 did not apply.
Conclusion: The payments were not fees for technical services and were not subject to deduction of tax at source under section 195; the demand raised under section 201 and interest under section 201(1A) were directed to be deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment to a non-resident for liaison and procurement of orders, without rendering technical or managerial services, is not fees for technical services and therefore does not attract tax deduction at source under section 195.