Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Assessee wins appeal: Payments to System Integration Inc. USA not subject to TDS</h1> The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, ruling that payments to System Integration Inc. USA were not for technical services and thus not subject ... TDS u/s 195 - payments made for services provided by SII, USA were in the nature of technical services liable for deduction of tax at source - income deemed to accrued or arise in India - CIT(A) confirming the action of ITO that services provided by System Integration Inc. USA are covered as fees under the India-USA double taxations avoidance agreement (DTAA) and hence taxable under Article 12 of DTAA - HELD THAT:- Payment made by the assessee to Non resident company SII is not for any fee “for technical services” and the payment was only towards commission for procurement of orders and reimbursement of incidental charges incurred. Since the payment was not for “fees for technical services” and further the payment was made to the Non residential company having no permanent establishment or business connection in India, the alleged payment for procurement of orders are not subject to deduction of tax at source u/s 195. CIT(A) erred in confirming the action of the Ld. A.O. - alleged payments to SII in USA during Financial Year 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively are only towards the charges for procurement or orders and reimbursement of expenses and are not in the nature of “fees for technical services” and thus do not fall in the ambit of Section 9 of the Act and thus Section 195 of the Act is not applicable in these payments - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues Involved:1. Applicability of Section 195/201 of the Income Tax Act.2. Taxability of services under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).3. Classification of services as 'fees for technical services' under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act.4. Determination of whether services provided by System Integration Inc. USA involved making technology available.5. Non-deductibility of TDS on payments made to System Integration Inc. USA.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Applicability of Section 195/201 of the Income Tax Act:The primary issue was whether the payments made by the assessee to System Integration Inc. USA (SII) were subject to tax deduction at source (TDS) under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that the payments were not liable for TDS as they were for procurement of orders and not for technical services. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] held that the payments were for technical services and thus liable for TDS under Section 195/201.2. Taxability of Services under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA):The CIT(A) confirmed the ITO's decision that the services provided by SII were taxable under Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA as fees for technical services. The assessee contended that the services were not technical but were merely for order procurement, which should not be taxed under the DTAA.3. Classification of Services as 'Fees for Technical Services' under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act:The ITO and CIT(A) classified the payments as 'fees for technical services' under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, which includes managerial, technical, or consultancy services. The assessee argued that SII did not provide any technical services but acted as a liaison and procurement agent. The Tribunal found that SII only procured orders and did not provide any technical or managerial services, thus the payments did not qualify as 'fees for technical services.'4. Determination of Whether Services Provided by System Integration Inc. USA Involved Making Technology Available:The CIT(A) held that the services provided by SII involved making technology available to the assessee. However, the Tribunal found that SII merely procured orders and did not make any technology available to the assessee. The Tribunal relied on the certificate issued by SII stating that they only acted as a liaison and procurement agent and did not provide any technical or managerial services.5. Non-deductibility of TDS on Payments Made to System Integration Inc. USA:The Tribunal concluded that the payments made to SII were not for technical services but were for procurement of orders and reimbursement of expenses. As such, these payments were not subject to TDS under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the revenue to delete the demand for default of TDS and interest levied under Section 201(1A) of the Act.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, holding that the payments made to SII were not for technical services and thus not subject to TDS under Section 195. The Tribunal set aside the findings of the CIT(A) and directed the revenue to delete the TDS demand and interest levied.Order Pronounced:The order was pronounced in the open Court on 16.09.2020.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found