Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sums of Rs. 24,25,000 incurred in connection with setting up the rayon factory formed part of the assessee's "actual cost" for purposes of depreciation and development rebate, and whether the assessee was therefore entitled to the claimed allowances on that amount.
Analysis: The expression "actual cost" was held to bear its commercial and accountancy meaning, since the Act did not define it. On that approach, expenditure directly connected with bringing the factory and machinery into existence and into working condition, including installation expenses, survey and mortgage-related charges, wages and salaries during construction, reward for expeditious installation, interest on deferred payment for machinery, and interest on borrowed capital used for setting up the plant, was treated as part of the capital cost. The fact that part of the funds came by way of loan did not reduce the actual cost, because source of funds was held immaterial for depreciation purposes. The contrary view excluding such items was rejected.
Conclusion: The entire disputed sum of Rs. 24,25,000 was part of the actual cost of the assets, and the assessee was entitled to depreciation and development rebate thereon.