TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules late filing fees not applicable before 01.06.2015</h1> The Tribunal held that late filing fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act could not be charged for periods before 01.06.2015, as the amendment in ... Levy of late filing fee u/s 234E - delay in filing of TDS return/statement before 01.06.2015 i.e. insertion of clause (c) to section 200A - conflicting decisions - HELD THAT:- We find, identical issue had come up before the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Udit Jain [2019 (11) TMI 1390 - ITAT DELHI] after considering the decision of Fatehraj Singhvi [2016 (9) TMI 964 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] as well as the decision of Rajesh Kourani vs. UOI [2017 (7) TMI 458 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] has decided the issue in favour of the assessee. After considering the above conflicting decisions, the coordinate benches of the Tribunal are taking the view that when there are conflicting decisions, the decision in favour of the assessee should be followed in the light of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vegetables Products Limited [1973 (1) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT]. In the light of the above discussion we hold that the CIT(A) is not justified in confirming the late fee levied by the AO u/s. 200 A r.w.s. 234 E since the defaults are prior to 1.06.2015. Accordingly we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and the fee levied u/s. 234 E is directed to be deleted. - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues Involved:1. Levy of late filing fee under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act.2. Applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) for computation of fees under Section 234E.3. Rule of consistency in judicial decisions.4. Validity and constitutional challenge of Section 234E.5. Period of applicability for the levy of fees under Section 234E.Detailed Analysis:1. Levy of Late Filing Fee under Section 234E:The core issue in this appeal is the levy of fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act for the delay in filing TDS statements. The appellant challenged the levy, arguing that the fee under Section 234E is not leviable for periods before 01.06.2015, the date when clause (c) was inserted in Section 200A(1) for the computation of such fees during processing.2. Applicability of Section 200A(1)(c) for Computation of Fees under Section 234E:The Revenue argued that Section 234E is a charging provision and the insertion of clause (c) in Section 200A(1) by the Finance Act, 2015 is merely a machinery provision for processing TDS statements. The DR contended that the fee under Section 234E was always chargeable from 01.07.2012, and the amendment in Section 200A(1)(c) only facilitated the computation of such fees. The Tribunal, however, noted that the amendment to Section 200A(1) is prospective and not retroactive, meaning fees under Section 234E could not be charged for periods before 01.06.2015.3. Rule of Consistency in Judicial Decisions:The DR cited the principle of the rule of consistency, referring to the decision in Krishak Bharati Cooperative Ltd vs. DCIT, where the rule should not create anomalies. However, the Tribunal emphasized that in cases of conflicting High Court decisions, the decision favoring the assessee should be followed, as held by the Supreme Court in CIT vs. Vegetable Products Ltd.4. Validity and Constitutional Challenge of Section 234E:The DR highlighted that various High Courts, including the Gujarat, Madras, and Rajasthan High Courts, have upheld the validity of Section 234E, asserting that it is not ultra vires or violative of the constitution. The Tribunal acknowledged these decisions but focused on whether the computation of fees under Section 234E could be applied retroactively.5. Period of Applicability for the Levy of Fees under Section 234E:The Tribunal noted that the TDS statements in question were filed before 01.06.2015. Referring to the Karnataka High Court's decision in Fatehraj Singhvi vs. UOI, the Tribunal held that the amendment to Section 200A(1) is prospective. Therefore, for periods before 01.06.2015, no late filing fee under Section 234E could be charged during the processing of TDS statements.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the levy of late fee under Section 234E for delays in filing TDS statements before 01.06.2015. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities and directing the deletion of the fees levied under Section 234E. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 31.08.2020.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
