Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (9) TMI 194 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal quashes reassessment order based on change of opinion without fresh material, violating law. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment order as it was deemed based on a mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal quashes reassessment order based on change of opinion without fresh material, violating law.

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment order as it was deemed based on a mere change of opinion without fresh tangible material, violating the law. The reassessment was found to be invalid under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, with no need to address the disallowance of Rs. 2,203,234 related to "Provision for Demo Inventory." The decision was made on 03.09.2020.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Confirmation of disallowance of Rs. 2,203,234 in respect of "Provision for Demo Inventory" charged to the Profit & Loss account.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147/148:

                          The primary contention was whether the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) were valid under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that the reassessment was barred by limitation as per the proviso to Section 147, asserting there was no failure on their part to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. The assessee also contended that there was no fresh or tangible material that emerged post the original assessment, and the reassessment was merely based on a change of opinion on the same set of facts considered during the original assessment.

                          The Tribunal examined the reasons for reopening the assessment, which were based on the AO's review of the existing records, specifically the Profit & Loss account, where an amount of Rs. 2,203,234 was debited as "Provision for Demo and testing equipment." The AO considered these expenses as future contingent expenditure and believed they should have been disallowed.

                          The Tribunal found that the AO had no new tangible material and relied solely on the assessment records, which were already available during the original assessment proceedings. It was noted that the AO did not point out any specific non-disclosure by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that the first proviso to Section 147 applies, which prohibits action after four years unless there is a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. The Tribunal concluded that the reassessment was based on a mere change of opinion, which is not permissible under the law.

                          The Tribunal referenced several judicial decisions, including the Supreme Court's ruling in New Delhi Television Ltd., which clarified that subsequent facts can be considered for reopening assessments, but there must be a failure to disclose material facts. The Tribunal also cited the Delhi High Court's decision in Donaldson India Filters Systems (P.) Ltd., which highlighted that the AO must show that primary disclosure was insufficient for further investigation.

                          The Tribunal further noted that the decision in Consolidated Photo and Finvest Limited, relied upon by the Revenue, was no longer good law following subsequent rulings, including the Supreme Court's decision in Kelvinator of India Ltd., which established that a mere change of opinion cannot justify reopening an assessment.

                          2. Confirmation of Disallowance of Rs. 2,203,234 in Respect of "Provision for Demo Inventory":

                          Given the Tribunal's decision to quash the reassessment proceedings, it did not delve into the merits of the disallowance of Rs. 2,203,234 related to the "Provision for Demo Inventory." The Tribunal concluded that since the reassessment order was invalid, there was no need to address the substantive issue of the disallowance.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, quashing the reassessment order on the grounds that it was based on a mere change of opinion without any fresh tangible material, and thus, was not in accordance with the law. The Tribunal did not find it necessary to examine the merits of the disallowance of Rs. 2,203,234, as the reassessment itself was invalid. The order was pronounced in the open court on 03.09.2020.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found