Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal upholds Capital Gains assessment for A.Y. 2012-13, denies Section 54F exemption due to non-compliance</h1> The Tribunal upheld the assessment of Capital Gains in A.Y. 2012-13 for the transfer of assets, rejecting the assessee's claim for assessment in A.Y. ... Deduction u/s 54F - Capital Gains arose on transfer of assets - Year of assessment - A.Y. 2012-13 or in A.Y. 2013-14 - whether assessee has within a period of one year or after the date on which the transfer took place purchased or within a period of 3 years after the date constructed one residential house? - HELD THAT:- In the present case, admittedly, the assessee neither purchase one residential house within the period of one year before the date of transfer or after two years of date of transfer nor constructed house within a period of three years. The only contention that the assessee was that the assessee made investments under the Capital Gain Scheme almost entire consideration under fixed deposits with the Syndicate Bank. Assessee transferred original asset on 26-08-2011 therefore in our opinion, the Capital Gain has to be assessed in the year under consideration i.e. A.Y. 2012-13. In order to get exemption u/s. 54F of the Act, the assessee must have purchased new asset one year before (26-08-2010) or two years after (26-08-2013) or constructed one residential house within a period of three years (26-08-2014). As rightly pointed by Shri Alok Malviya, ld. DR that the assessee did not utilize the sale consideration for purchase of flat or construction of one residential house. Therefore, the exemption as claimed by the assessee u/s. 54F of the Act is liable to be denied. Thus, in our opinion the order of CIT(A) is justified that the Capital Gains is to be assessed under the year under consideration, consequently, the assessee is not entitled to claim exemption u/s. 54F - Decided against assessee. Issues Involved:Determining the assessment year for Capital Gains arising from the transfer of assets.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Assessment Year for Capital GainsThe primary issue in this case is whether the Capital Gains arising from the transfer of assets should be assessed in the assessment year 2012-13 or 2013-14 based on the date of transfer and utilization of sale consideration for new asset acquisition.Analysis:The assessee sold inherited agricultural land, with the main contention being the timing of the transfer and utilization of sale proceeds. The Assessing Officer argued that since the transfer date was 26-08-2011, the Capital Gains should be assessed in A.Y. 2012-13. The assessee claimed that the major portion of the sale consideration was realized in 2012, justifying assessment in A.Y. 2013-14. However, the Assessing Officer found the assessee's submissions unsatisfactory, leading to the assessment of Long Term Capital Gain in A.Y. 2012-13. The CIT(A) upheld this decision, emphasizing the transfer date as conclusive evidence for Capital Gain realization.Issue 2: Compliance with Section 54F for ExemptionAnother aspect of contention was the compliance with Section 54F for exemption eligibility based on the purchase or construction of a new residential property within specified timelines.Analysis:The Assessing Officer highlighted that the assessee failed to utilize the sale consideration for new asset acquisition within the stipulated period, rendering them ineligible for exemption under Section 54F. The assessee's investments under the Capital Gain Scheme did not align with the prescribed timelines, leading to the denial of exemption. The Tribunal concurred, stating that the assessee did not meet the criteria for exemption as specified in Section 54F, ultimately upholding the denial of exemption and assessment of Capital Gains in the relevant year.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the assessment of Capital Gains in A.Y. 2012-13 and denying the exemption claimed under Section 54F due to non-compliance with the statutory requirements. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to timelines and conditions stipulated in tax laws for claiming exemptions related to Capital Gains on asset transfers.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found