ITAT Chennai dismisses appeal on agricultural income but allows penalty appeal

The ITAT Chennai dismissed the assessee's appeal related to the disallowance of agricultural income claim but allowed the appeal concerning penalty proceedings. The penalty was deleted as the AO did not find the assessee's explanation false. The judgment was pronounced on Wednesday, 4th March 2020 in Chennai.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of agricultural income claim by Assessing Officer.
2. Penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.

Analysis:
1. The assessee, an HUF, filed appeals against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) orders for the assessment year 2016-17, challenging the disallowance of its agricultural income claim. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim due to lack of details/evidences. The assessee voluntarily admitted to a portion of the income but later faced penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeals, leading to the appeals filed by the assessee before the ITAT Chennai.

2. On the quantum appeal, the Ld. AR argued that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition made by the AO without considering the evidences provided by the assessee. The Ld. DR, however, pointed out that the assessee had admitted to the income voluntarily. The ITAT Chennai observed that the assessee had indeed admitted to a portion of the income voluntarily, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on this issue.

3. Regarding the penalty proceedings, the Ld. AR contended that the penalty should not have been levied as the assessee had cooperated and offered additional income voluntarily. The assessee provided confirmation letters, certificates, and bank details to support the transactions. The AO initiated penalty proceedings despite the explanations provided by the assessee. The ITAT Chennai held that since the AO did not record a finding that the explanation offered by the assessee was false, the penalty levied was unsustainable. Therefore, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal on this issue was allowed.

4. In conclusion, the ITAT Chennai dismissed the assessee's appeal in ITA No. 2348/Chny/2019 related to the disallowance of agricultural income claim but allowed the appeal in ITA No. 2349/Chny/2019 concerning the penalty proceedings. The judgment was pronounced on Wednesday, 4th March 2020 in Chennai.

---