Detention on remand proceedings invalidated for non-supply of requested remand orders, defeating an effective representation.

Where a detention order relies on remand proceedings, the remand orders are relevant documents if they bear on the stage of investigation, custody extension, and the basis for continued detention. Non-furnishing of those orders to the detenu, despite a request, deprives her of an effective opportunity to make a representation and constitutes a procedural defect. The Madras HC held that this violation of the detenu's right to representation vitiated the detention order, distinguished the respondent's relied-on precedent on the ground that the remand order substance had there been placed before the authority, and quashed the detention while allowing the habeas corpus petition.

---

---

Issues: Whether non-furnishing of the remand orders to the detenu, despite a request, deprived her of an effective opportunity to make a representation and thereby vitiated the detention order.

Analysis: The detention was challenged on the ground that the remand orders, which were relied upon in the detention record, were not supplied to the detenu after she sought them in her representation. The Court held that the remand orders were relevant documents because they could disclose the stage of investigation, the materials considered for extension of custody, and the circumstances bearing on continued detention. Without those documents, the detenu would be unable to make an effective representation. The decision relied upon by the respondents was distinguished because, in that case, the substance of the remand order had been placed before the detaining authority, whereas here the orders were not furnished to the detenu at all.

Conclusion: Non-supply of the remand orders violated the detenu's right to make an effective representation and vitiated the detention order.

Final Conclusion: The detention order was quashed and the habeas corpus petition was allowed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a detention order relies on remand proceedings, failure to furnish the requested remand orders to the detenu, when necessary for making an effective representation, constitutes a procedural defect that invalidates the detention.

---