2020 (6) TMI 520 - AAR - GST

Unregistered road transport providers fall under GTA definition, recipients must pay GST under reverse charge mechanism section 9(3)

In Re: M/s. Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation,

In Re: M/s. Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation, - 2020 (38) G.S.T.L. 269 (A. A. R. - GST - UK), [2021] 87 G S.T.R. 324 (AAR) Issues Involved:1. Whether a person, unregistered with GST, providing road transport services by his own truck qualifies as GTA for RCM under GST.2. Whether issuance of E-way bill, Form 2.1 & 3.3 by or to an unregistered road transporter providing road transport services by his own truck is treated as a consignment note for GST-RCM purposes.3. Whether a person, unregistered with GST, providing road transport services by hiring trucks from third parties, qualifies as GTA for RCM under GST.4. Whether issuance of E-way bill, Form 2.1 & 3.3 by or to an unregistered road transporter providing road transport services by hiring trucks from third parties is treated as a consignment note for GST-RCM purposes.Detailed Analysis:1. Unregistered Person Providing Road Transport Services by Own Truck:The applicant sought clarification on whether a person unregistered with GST, providing road transport services using their own truck, falls under the definition of Goods Transport Agency (GTA) and is subject to Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM). The ruling clarified that services provided by GTA, as defined in Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), include any person providing transport services and issuing a consignment note. The applicant's practice of issuing Form 2.1, which includes details like material, vehicle number, and driver information, was considered equivalent to a consignment note. Therefore, such services fall under the definition of GTA and are subject to RCM under Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate).2. Issuance of E-way Bill, Form 2.1 & 3.3 by/to Unregistered Transporter:The applicant queried if the issuance of E-way bill, Form 2.1, and Form 3.3 by or to an unregistered road transporter is treated as a consignment note for GST-RCM purposes. The ruling found that the applicant's Form 2.1, which contains necessary details for transporting goods, serves the purpose of a consignment note as per the explanation to Rule 4B of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. This form, combined with Form 3.3, which confirms delivery, fulfills the requirement of a consignment note, thereby satisfying the conditions for GTA services under RCM.3. Unregistered Person Hiring Trucks from Third Parties:The applicant also sought clarification on whether a person unregistered with GST, who provides road transport services by hiring trucks from third parties, qualifies as GTA for RCM purposes. The ruling applied the same principles as in the first issue. Since the applicant issues Form 2.1 and the transporter is responsible for the safe delivery of goods, the service qualifies as GTA under the same notifications and is subject to RCM.4. Issuance of E-way Bill, Form 2.1 & 3.3 by/to Unregistered Transporter Hiring Trucks:The final query was whether the issuance of E-way bill, Form 2.1, and Form 3.3 by or to an unregistered transporter hiring trucks from third parties is treated as a consignment note for GST-RCM purposes. The ruling reiterated that Form 2.1, which includes all necessary details and is used in conjunction with Form 3.3, qualifies as a consignment note. This ensures that the services provided by such transporters fall under the definition of GTA and are subject to RCM.Conclusion:The ruling concluded that services received from unregistered transporters by the applicant fall under the definition of GTA services as per Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) and are covered under RCM as per Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate). Form 2.1 issued by the applicant can be considered a consignment note, fulfilling the necessary conditions for GTA services under GST.