Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>ITAT Bangalore clarifies tax treatment of share premium & capital, emphasizes fair hearings</h1> <h3>M/s. IBS Fintech India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward – 3 (1) (4), Bengaluru.</h3> The ITAT Bangalore addressed the invocation of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act for taxing share premium and the taxation of share capital under ... Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - CIT-A taxing the share premium hereunder - HELD THAT:- Respectfully following this Tribunal order and in turn the judgment of Hon’ble Bombay High Court rendered in the case of Vodafone M-Pesa Ltd., Vs. Pr.CIT [2018 (3) TMI 530 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] we set aside the order of CIT(A) on this issue and restore the matter back to the file of AO for a fresh decision. Unexplained cash credit - Addition u/s 56 v/s 68 - AO has made addition by treating the same as income under section 56(2)(viib) - Enhancement by CIT-A without complying with the mandatory requirements of section 251 - HELD THAT:- We find that in Assessment Order, the AO has noted that prima facie the said amount of ₹ 95 lakhs can be construed as unexplained cash credit and thereafter, he has discussed and decided about the addition ultimately made by him of ₹ 93,01,290/- under section 56(2)(viib) Assessment Order is dated 06.11.2017. Under these facts, it appears that there is apparent mistake in the Assessment Order because even after observing this in para 1.1 of the Assessment Order that the entire amount of ₹ 95 lakhs is unexplained cash credit, the AO has made addition of only ₹ 93,01,290/- under section 56(2)(viib) without making any addition u/s 68. Even now, the period of rectification under section 154 has not expired and hence, we feel it proper that on this aspect also as to whether any addition is to be made under section 68 or not, we feel that the matter should be decided afresh by the AO.Assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Issues:1. Invocation of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act and taxation of share premium.2. Taxation of share capital along with premium under section 68 without providing a specific opportunity for hearing.Issue 1: Invocation of section 56(2)(viib) of the Act:The appeal challenged the invocation of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act and taxation of share premium. The assessee contended that the matter should be reconsidered based on a Tribunal order and the judgment of the Bombay High Court in a similar case. The Tribunal referred to the judgment of the Bombay High Court, emphasizing that the valuation method chosen by the assessee should be respected, and any fresh valuation should be based on the DCF method. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and directed a fresh decision by the assessing officer following the Bombay High Court's guidance.Issue 2: Taxation under section 68 without specific hearing opportunity:Regarding the taxation of share capital along with premium under section 68 without providing a specific opportunity for hearing, the Tribunal noted discrepancies in the Assessment Order. Although the AO initially considered the entire amount as unexplained cash credit, only a portion was added as income under section 56(2)(viib). The Tribunal observed an apparent mistake in the Assessment Order and recommended a fresh decision by the AO to determine if any addition should be made under section 68. As the period for rectification had not expired, the Tribunal concluded that the matter should be reviewed afresh by the AO. Consequently, the Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes.In summary, the ITAT Bangalore addressed the issues of invoking section 56(2)(viib) for taxation of share premium and the taxation of share capital under section 68 without a specific hearing opportunity. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and directed a fresh decision by the assessing officer in both instances. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of following legal procedures and ensuring fair hearings in tax assessments.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found