Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (4) TMI 799 - HC - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Rules Photography Services Value Must Be Separate from Materials, Prevents Double Taxation on Photography Goods. The HC allowed the appeals, overturning previous orders, and ruled that the value of photography services must be calculated separately from the cost of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court Rules Photography Services Value Must Be Separate from Materials, Prevents Double Taxation on Photography Goods.

                          The HC allowed the appeals, overturning previous orders, and ruled that the value of photography services must be calculated separately from the cost of photography paper and chemicals, which are considered goods. It also determined that the term 'sale' in Notification No.12/03-ST includes deemed sales under Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution. This decision prevents double taxation on materials used in photography services.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the use of photography paper and chemicals constitutes a sale of goods under Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution, and if the value of photography services should be determined separately from the cost of such goods.
                          2. Whether the term 'sale' in exemption Notification No.12/03-ST should be interpreted as per Section 2(h) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, or also include deemed 'sale' as defined by Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Sale of Photography Paper and Chemicals:
                          The appellant, engaged in processing, printing, and exposure of color photographic films, argued that the cost of photography paper and chemicals should be excluded from the taxable value of photography services. The appellant contended that these materials fall under the category of goods and thus should be exempt from service tax under Notification No.12/2003-ST. The initial adjudicating authority and the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected this argument, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in C.K. Jidheesh vs. Union of India, which held that such contracts are purely service contracts without any element of sale of goods.

                          However, the appellant cited the larger bench decision in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited vs. Union of India, which overruled C.K. Jidheesh and established that service tax should only be levied on the service portion, not on the cost of materials. The Tribunal's Larger Bench upheld the levy of service tax on the gross value, including materials, unless documentary proof of the value of goods sold was provided.

                          The High Court, referencing the Supreme Court's judgment in State of Karnataka vs. M/s Pro. Lab, concluded that photography services, involving both goods and services, qualify as works contracts. Consequently, under Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution, the value of goods used in photography services should be separated from the service component, thus exempting them from service tax. The court held that the value of photography services should be determined separately from the cost of goods like photography paper and chemicals.

                          2. Interpretation of 'Sale' in Notification No.12/03-ST:
                          The appellant argued that the term 'sale' in Notification No.12/03-ST should include 'deemed sale' as per Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution. The Tribunal initially held that the term 'sale' should be interpreted as per Section 2(h) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and not include deemed sales under Article 366(29A)(b).

                          The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's interpretation, stating that the term 'sale' in the notification should indeed include deemed sales under Article 366(29A)(b). The court emphasized that after the 46th Amendment, the sale element in works contracts, including photography services, is separable and subject to sales tax by states under Entry 54 of List II. Therefore, the value of goods used in providing photography services should be excluded from the taxable value of services.

                          Conclusion:
                          The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders. It held that the value of photography services should be determined separately from the cost of photography paper and chemicals, which constitute goods. Additionally, the term 'sale' in Notification No.12/03-ST includes deemed sales as defined by Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution. The court's decision ensures that the appellant is not subjected to double taxation on the same value of materials and consumables used in photography services.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found