Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid by the assessee to a non-resident vendor on unpaid purchase money of a ship was deductible under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in the absence of deduction of tax at source, and whether the assessee could invoke section 10(15)(iv)(c) or section 36(1)(iii) to claim the deduction.
Analysis: The interest paid to the non-resident was held to be income chargeable under the Act in the hands of the recipient, attracting the machinery of deduction of tax under section 195. Since no tax was deducted or paid as required by Chapter XVII-B, section 40(a)(i) barred the allowance of the amount in computing business income, and section 37(1) could not be invoked. The claim under section 10(15)(iv)(c) failed because the assessee had not itself borrowed money or incurred the foreign debt; the debt had been incurred by the original purchaser. The alternative reliance on section 36(1)(iii) also failed because the statutory bar under section 40(a)(i) applied, even assuming the interest otherwise fell within that provision.
Conclusion: The deduction was not allowable to the assessee; the answer to the referred question was in the negative and the Revenue succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The interest paid to the non-resident vendor remained subject to the tax-deduction regime, and non-compliance with that regime disentitled the assessee from claiming the deduction in business computation.
Ratio Decidendi: Where interest payable to a non-resident is chargeable under the Act and tax is not deducted as required, section 40(a)(i) prevents deduction of that amount in computing business income, and a successor purchaser cannot claim exclusion under provisions meant for borrowing or debt incurred by the industrial undertaking itself.