Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal partially upholds appeal, directs re-examination, and deletions</h1> <h3>M/s Moraj Building Concepts Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO-15 (2) (3), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai.</h3> M/s Moraj Building Concepts Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO-15 (2) (3), Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Addition/Disallowance of Rs. 38,319/- for suppressed profit element in purchases.2. Disallowance of Rs. 7,50,000/- on account of consultancy charges paid to Modern Line Distribution.3. Addition of Rs. 7,63,865/- on account of unexplained expenses.4. Disallowance of Rs. 55,00,000/- on account of payment made to Shri Sai Prerna Charitable Trust.5. Addition of Rs. 1,27,999/- for purchases from Satya Narayan Marble.6. Addition of Rs. 5,00,000/- u/s 68 on account of tentative buy price of a flat to R.A. Chug.7. Addition of Rs. 2,66,393/- for alleged discrepancy in cash in hand.8. Addition of Rs. 16,77,178/- on account of alleged untallied trial balance.Detailed Analysis:1. Addition/Disallowance of Rs. 38,319/- for Suppressed Profit Element in Purchases:The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 38,319/- (12.5% of Rs. 3,06,555) made by the AO based on the information that M/s Khushi Enterprises issued bogus bills. The CIT(A) upheld this addition citing the decision in CIT v. Simit P. Sheth and Bholanath Polyfab Pvt. Ltd., estimating suppressed profit at 12.5%. The tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s order was based on proper appreciation of facts and law, and thus dismissed the appeal.2. Disallowance of Rs. 7,50,000/- on Account of Consultancy Charges Paid to Modern Line Distribution:The AO disallowed Rs. 15,00,000/- paid to Modern Line Distribution for non-deduction of TDS. The CIT(A) noted that only Rs. 7,50,000/- was paid and upheld the disallowance, adding it back to WIP. The tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the applicability of Article 14 of the DTAA with UAE and the necessity of TDS, thus allowing the appeal for statistical purposes.3. Addition of Rs. 7,63,865/- on Account of Unexplained Expenses:The AO added Rs. 7,63,865/- based on entries in impounded books related to purchases. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, noting the assessee's failure to prove the expenditure. The tribunal directed the AO to re-examine the evidence and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.4. Disallowance of Rs. 55,00,000/- on Account of Payment Made to Shri Sai Prerna Charitable Trust:The AO disallowed Rs. 55,00,000/- added to WIP as donation to Shri Sai Prerna Charitable Trust. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, noting the lack of business connection and tax exemption certificate. The tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), confirming the reduction of WIP and higher profit in the completion year.5. Addition of Rs. 1,27,999/- for Purchases from Satya Narayan Marble:The AO disallowed Rs. 1,27,999/- as cash payment for defective goods return. The CIT(A) upheld this addition. The tribunal found that the goods were returned and no payment was made, thus deleting the addition and allowing the appeal.6. Addition of Rs. 5,00,000/- u/s 68 on Account of Tentative Buy Price of a Flat to R.A. Chug:The AO added Rs. 5,00,000/- based on entries in impounded documents. The CIT(A) upheld this addition. The tribunal found no evidence of actual payment and deleted the addition, allowing the appeal.7. Addition of Rs. 2,66,393/- for Alleged Discrepancy in Cash in Hand:The AO added Rs. 2,66,393/- for cash discrepancy during the survey. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, questioning the post-survey explanation. The tribunal found the explanation valid and deleted the addition, allowing the appeal.8. Addition of Rs. 16,77,178/- on Account of Alleged Untallied Trial Balance:The AO added Rs. 16,77,178/- for untallied trial balance. The CIT(A) upheld this, noting the lack of explanation. The tribunal found the discrepancy due to software transition and deleted the addition, allowing the appeal.Conclusion:The tribunal upheld some additions and disallowances while directing re-examination or deletion of others, thus partly allowing the appeal. The order was pronounced on 19/02/2020.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found