Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal directs AO to re-examine share application money addition, apply 3% net profit rate</h1> <h3>Neelkamal Cineplex Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward-13 (2), New Delhi.</h3> Neelkamal Cineplex Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward-13 (2), New Delhi. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Addition of Rs. 1,07,00,000/- on account of share application money.2. Addition of Rs. 77,08,967/- on account of difference in opening and closing stock.3. Rejection of books of account and estimation of net profit at 8%.Detailed Analysis:1. Addition of Rs. 1,07,00,000/- on Account of Share Application Money:The assessee had received share application money totaling Rs. 4,02,50,000/-, with Rs. 77 lakh received during the year and Rs. 3,25,00,000/- outstanding as on 01.04.2010. The AO requested the assessee to provide confirmations and supporting documents for the share application money. In the absence of such confirmations, the AO added Rs. 1,07,00,000/- to the assessee's total income. On appeal, the CIT(A) restricted this addition to Rs. 57 lakhs, specifically from Rama Ply Board India Private Limited, due to lack of confirmation from the party. The Tribunal found that there was a running account between the assessee and Rama Ply Board Industries Ltd. and restored the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication, directing the AO to give the assessee an opportunity to substantiate the nature of the transaction.2. Addition of Rs. 77,08,967/- on Account of Difference in Opening and Closing Stock:The AO observed a discrepancy between the opening stock as on 01.04.2010 (Rs. 12,15,76,258/-) and the closing stock as on 31.03.2010 (Rs. 11,38,67,290/-). The assessee explained that the difference was due to an expenditure incurred for completing a mall, which was added to the opening stock while filing the return of income. The AO rejected this explanation, leading to an addition of Rs. 77,08,967/-. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, noting that the assessee did not provide sufficient evidence of the expenditure incurred. The Tribunal, considering the totality of facts, directed the AO to adopt a net profit rate of 3% on the turnover plus the difference in stocks, resulting in a recomputed addition.3. Rejection of Books of Account and Estimation of Net Profit at 8%:Due to discrepancies in the share application money and stock figures, the AO deemed the assessee's books of account unreliable and invoked Section 145 of the IT Act. The AO estimated the net income at 8% of the gross receipts (Rs. 1,39,70,000/-), leading to an additional income of Rs. 10,01,788/-. The CIT(A) upheld this estimation. The Tribunal, however, found that the profit rate of 8% was on the higher side and directed the AO to adopt a net profit rate of 3%, resulting in a revised net profit of Rs. 6,50,369/-, less the net profit already disclosed by the assessee.Conclusion:The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to:1. Re-examine the addition of Rs. 57 lakhs related to share application money from Rama Ply Board India Private Limited.2. Recompute the addition by adopting a net profit rate of 3% on the turnover plus the difference in stocks.3. Provide the assessee with an opportunity to substantiate the nature of the transactions and decide the issues as per facts and law.The decision was pronounced in the open court on 18.02.2020.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found