Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Vaibhav Buildtech's Plan Approved by Creditors, Court Ends Moratorium Order</h1> <h3>Durga Enterprises Versus SRS Meditech Ltd.</h3> Durga Enterprises Versus SRS Meditech Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Approval of the resolution plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.2. Compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016.3. Constitution and functioning of the Committee of Creditors (CoC).4. Valuation and liquidation value determination.5. Compliance with Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.6. Implementation and monitoring of the resolution plan.7. Distribution of funds and settlement of claims.8. Performance security compliance under Regulation 39(4) and 36B(4A).Detailed Analysis:1. Approval of the Resolution Plan:The application was filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking sanction of the resolution plan approved by the CoC. The plan was approved by 93% of the CoC members, satisfying the requirement of Section 30(4) of the Code.2. Compliance with Regulations:The RP issued a public announcement for claims from creditors as per Regulation 6 and constituted the CoC in accordance with Section 21. Two registered valuers were appointed to determine the fair and liquidation values of the corporate debtor, as per Regulation 35. The RP also complied with Regulation 36(A) by inviting expressions of interest (EOI) and publishing Form G.3. Constitution and Functioning of CoC:Initially, the CoC consisted of seven financial creditors, which was later reconstituted to include ten creditors. The CoC approved the eligibility criteria for resolution applicants and the evaluation matrix. The RP received EOIs from four prospective applicants and extended the submission deadlines for resolution plans multiple times to ensure thorough verification.4. Valuation and Liquidation Value Determination:The fair and liquidation values were determined by two valuers, averaging Rs. 192.71 lacs and Rs. 135.09 lacs, respectively. These values were presented to the CoC along with the resolution plan.5. Compliance with Section 30(2):The resolution plan provided for:- Full payment of CIRP costs in priority.- Payment to operational creditors and dissenting unsecured financial creditors in compliance with Section 30(2)(b).- Management and supervision of the corporate debtor post-approval.- Compliance with all provisions of the Code and Regulations, as certified by the RP.- The plan did not contravene any existing laws.6. Implementation and Monitoring:An Implementation and Monitoring Committee was proposed, comprising the RP, an Assistant General Manager from SBI, and a technical expert. The plan included a detailed implementation schedule and provisions for effective supervision.7. Distribution of Funds and Settlement of Claims:The resolution plan detailed the distribution of funds:- Rs. 3.50 crore to secured financial creditors.- Rs. 1.25 crore for employees and workmen.- Rs.0.75 crore for CIRP costs.- Rs.0.25 crore for unsecured financial creditors.- Rs.0.35 crore for operational creditors.8. Performance Security Compliance:The RP filed an affidavit confirming the transfer of Rs. 30 lakh (5% of the cash contribution) to the corporate debtor's account, complying with Regulation 36B(4A) and 39(4).Conclusion:The resolution plan submitted by Vaibhav Buildtech Private Limited was approved by the CoC with a 93% voting share. The plan met all requirements under Section 30(2) and 31(1) of the Code, including provisions for effective implementation and compliance with relevant regulations. The moratorium order ceased to have effect, and the RP was directed to forward all records to the Board. The application (CA No. 704/2019) was disposed of accordingly.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found