Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of the Special Committee rejecting the assessee's application under Section 16-D of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 on the ground of limitation and on the premise that the assessee had failed to cooperate in the assessment proceedings was sustainable, and whether the matter required interference and remand for fresh consideration after affording an effective opportunity of hearing.
Analysis: The application under Section 16-D was intended to provide redress where an assessee had been unable to effectively participate in the assessment proceedings or where the order complained of suffered from statutory illegality or violation of natural justice. The impugned rejection proceeded substantially on a three-year limitation theory, although no express limitation was prescribed under Section 16-D, and also did not adequately address the grievance that the assessments were made ex parte without a real opportunity of hearing. In these circumstances, the Court found that the Special Committee had not addressed the core issue and that the assessee was entitled to an opportunity to be heard.
Conclusion: The rejection by the Special Committee was quashed and the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh disposal on merits after granting the assessee an opportunity of hearing.