Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Directors' salaries subject to GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) per Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax</h1> <h3>In Re: M/s. Clay Craft India Pvt. Ltd.,</h3> In Re: M/s. Clay Craft India Pvt. Ltd., - [2020] 76 G S.T.R. 302 (AAR), 2020 (35) G.S.T.L. 580 (A. A. R. - GST - Raj.) Issues Involved:1. Whether GST is payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on the salary paid to Directors of the company.2. Whether the situation changes if the Director is also a part-time Director in another company.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. GST on Salary Paid to Directors under RCM:The applicant, a registered entity engaged in the manufacture of various items, sought clarification on whether the salary paid to its Directors, who also perform managerial roles within the company, is subject to GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM). The applicant argued that these Directors, treated as employees, should not attract GST on their salaries as per the provisions of the GST Act, 2017. The applicant cited various legal definitions and precedents to support their stance that Directors working as full-time employees should be excluded from GST under Schedule III of the CGST Act, 2017, which exempts services by an employee to the employer in the course of employment.The jurisdictional officer, however, contended that the services provided by the Directors are not covered under clause (1) of Schedule III to the CGST Act, 2017, as the Directors are not employees of the company. The officer emphasized that the consideration paid to Directors is for services rendered to the company, making the company the recipient and the Directors the suppliers of such services. Consequently, these services fall under Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, which mandates GST payment on a reverse charge basis for services supplied by a Director to the company.The ruling concluded that the consideration paid to Directors, whether termed as salary or otherwise, is liable to GST under RCM as per Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Directors are not considered employees under the CGST Act, 2017, and thus the services they provide to the company are taxable under RCM.2. GST on Salary if Director is a Part-time Director in Another Company:The second issue addressed whether the GST liability under RCM would change if the Director is also a part-time Director in another company. The ruling clarified that the situation remains the same regardless of the Director's part-time association with another company. The consideration paid to the Directors by the applicant company will continue to attract GST under RCM as per entry No. 6 of Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. The Directors, in this context, are still not considered employees of the company, and their services are taxable under RCM.Conclusion:The ruling unequivocally stated that the consideration paid to Directors by the applicant company, whether as salary or otherwise, is subject to GST under the Reverse Charge Mechanism. This applies even if the Director holds a part-time position in another company. The relevant legal provisions and notifications under the CGST Act, 2017, were cited to support this conclusion. The applicant's references to other legal definitions and precedents were deemed irrelevant in the context of the existing CGST law.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found