Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether freight and cartage payments were liable to disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) and whether demand could be sustained under section 201 where the transporters had allegedly included the receipts in their returns and paid tax.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the payments attracted the TDS provisions and, if tax had not been deducted, whether the payees had nevertheless disclosed the income and discharged the tax liability. The Tribunal noted the assessee's case that the payments were made to transporters without a contractual arrangement and that the transporters were income-tax assessees with supporting particulars on record. It further relied on the principle that when the deductees have already offered the income to tax, the deductor should not be fastened with a corresponding demand, and directed verification of the evidence produced by the assessee.
Conclusion: The issue was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification of whether the transporters had included the receipts in their returns and paid tax thereon; if so, the demand was to be deleted.