Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail in a prosecution under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 despite allegations of attempted export of a commercial quantity of Ketamine, recovery of controlled substances from linked premises, and statements recorded under section 67 of the Act.
Analysis: The material on record showed a prima facie case of a coordinated drug trafficking operation involving export of Ketamine in commercial quantity and recovery of Ephedrine Hydrochloride and Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride from premises connected with the applicant. The Court noted that the landlord's testimony supported the prosecution version regarding the Mundka godown and the applicant's link to the premises, while the emails and shipping documents were also relied upon to connect the applicant with the export consignment. The applicant's statement under section 67 of the Act was treated as available for consideration at the bail stage notwithstanding retraction, and the Court found that the record did not displace the prosecution's case sufficiently to satisfy the rigours of section 37 of the Act.
Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to bail and the application was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: In prosecutions under the NDPS Act involving commercial quantity, bail cannot be granted unless the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail; a prima facie showing of involvement and linkage to recovered contraband is sufficient to refuse bail.