TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court dismisses appeals challenging Customs Tribunal order, condones delay.</h1> <h3>Commissioner Versus Hyundai Motor India Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Supreme Court of India dismissed appeals against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dated 14 June 2019, ... Valuation - inclusion of warranty claims in assessable value - reverse charge mechanism - Section 66A of FA - Revenue neutrality - extended period of limitation - It was held that When the Overseas Distributor is establishing the network of Authorized Repairers for carrying out the warranty responsibility of the appellant, indeed, this will satisfy ‘customer care services’ provided on behalf of the client contained in Sub-Clause (iii) of the definition of ‘Business Auxiliary Service’, and would be taxable. HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with the impugned order - appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court of India in a 2020 judgment by Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and Mr. Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. condoned delay and dismissed appeals against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai dated 14 June, 2019.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
