Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal grants partial appeal, allows CENVAT credit for commercial complex pending verification. Emphasizes thorough verification process.</h1> <h3>M/s City View Bangalore Properties Pvt Ltd (Now Known as Embassy One Developers Pvt. Ltd.) Versus Commissioner Of Central Tax, Bangalore North</h3> The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal in part, permitting CENVAT credit for constructing a commercial complex, pending verification of its ... CENVAT Credit - input services - Works Contract - Transport of Goods by Road - Architect Services - Consulting Engineer Services - Management Consultancy Services - It appeared to Revenue that during the period from October 2007 to September 2010, as the project was under construction stage, and hence there was no output service (of renting) rendered during that period - HELD THAT:- The issue of availability of CENVAT credit, for construction of commercial complex which is meant for commercial activity and for earning rent, taxable under the provisions of Finance Act, 1994, is decided in favour of the assessee, in the aforementioned rulings, the appellant/assessee is held entitled to CENVAT credit. In the interest of justice, the matter is remanded for the limited purpose of verification of the commercial nature, which shall be verified from the Plan approved by the ‘Town Planning Authority’ and other facts (actual user for commercial purpose) as may be led before the Adjudicating Authority - appeal allowed by way of remand. Issues: Availability of CENVAT credit for construction of a commercial complex, verification of commercial nature for earning rent, change of company name during appeal.Analysis:1. Availability of CENVAT Credit: The appellant, a real estate developer, was providing various output services and registered with the Department since 2008. The Revenue disallowed CENVAT credit during the period from October 2007 to September 2010, as there was no output service rendered due to the construction stage of the project. The appellant contended that they were engaged in developing blocks for commercial and residential use, with some units sold or rented after completion. The restriction on CENVAT credit for construction services came into effect from April 1, 2011, as per Rule 2(l) of CCR, 2004. The appellant relied on previous tribunal rulings and high court cases to support their claim for allowing the appeal with consequential benefits.2. Verification of Commercial Nature: The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and the impugned order. It was held that the issue of availability of CENVAT credit for the construction of a commercial complex meant for commercial activity and earning rent, taxable under the Finance Act, 1994, was decided in favor of the assessee based on previous rulings. However, to ensure justice, the matter was remanded for verification of the commercial nature, including checking the plan approved by the Town Planning Authority and other evidence of actual commercial usage. The Tribunal clarified that the remand was only for arithmetical calculation purposes, allowing CENVAT credit upon verification as directed. The appeal was allowed in part and remanded in part for re-calculation of the admissible CENVAT credit by the original Adjudicating Authority.3. Change of Company Name: The appellant's company name changed to 'Embassy One Developers Pvt. Ltd.' during the appeal process. The Tribunal directed the Registry to reflect the new company name after the appellant's name and granted the counsel liberty to make the necessary entry in the Appeal Memo on the same day.In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment favored the appellant regarding the availability of CENVAT credit for the construction of a commercial complex, subject to verification of the commercial nature. The decision highlighted the importance of ensuring justice through proper verification processes, remanding the case for re-calculation of the admissible credit. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed the change of company name during the appeal, directing the necessary updates to be made in the records.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found