NCLT asserts jurisdiction in Insolvency Petition, confirms debt & default, appoints Resolution Professional, emphasizes Code compliance.

The National Company Law Tribunal asserted jurisdiction to hear the petition challenging the validity of an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It confirmed the existence of operational debt and default, dismissing the disputed claims raised by the respondent. The Tribunal appointed an Insolvency Resolution Professional and declared a moratorium to protect the corporate debtor's assets during the resolution process. The decision emphasized compliance with the Code's provisions and the continuation of essential services to the debtor.

---

---

Issues:
1. Jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal
2. Validity of the application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
3. Existence of operational debt and default
4. Dispute raised by the corporate debtor
5. Appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional
6. Declaration of moratorium and related orders

Jurisdiction of the National Company Law Tribunal:
The respondent argued that the National Company Law Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain the petition. However, the Tribunal found that it had the authority to adjudicate the matter.

Validity of the Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
The petitioner, an operational creditor, filed the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal examined the documents submitted by the petitioner, including demand notices and affidavits, to ascertain the validity of the claim.

Existence of Operational Debt and Default:
The petitioner claimed that the respondent owed an operational debt for the supply of goods, which remained unpaid. The Tribunal noted that the debt had fallen due on a specific date, and the petitioner had fulfilled the requirements of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The respondent failed to dispute the claim, leading to the Tribunal's conclusion that the debt was payable.

Dispute Raised by the Corporate Debtor:
The respondent raised various objections, including disputing the amount owed and citing reasons for non-delivery of goods. However, the Tribunal found these objections unsubstantiated and lacking supporting documentation. It determined that the petitioner had established the existence of the debt and default, and the claim was not time-barred.

Appointment of Insolvency Resolution Professional:
In accordance with the provisions of the Code, the Tribunal directed the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal specified the responsibilities of the Interim Resolution Professional and the necessary public announcements.

Declaration of Moratorium and Related Orders:
The Tribunal declared a moratorium to prohibit certain actions against the corporate debtor, safeguarding its assets during the insolvency resolution process. Essential services to the debtor were to continue uninterrupted, subject to government notifications. The Tribunal appointed an Insolvency Resolution Professional and communicated the order to relevant parties, ensuring compliance with the insolvency resolution process.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key issues addressed by the National Company Law Tribunal in the matter, providing a comprehensive overview of the decision and its implications.

---