1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court orders compliance with withdrawal of charge and property attachment, grants final opportunity for adherence.</h1> The Court emphasized compliance with its previous order directing withdrawal of a charge and attachment on a property. The writ-applicants sought a writ ... Withdrawal of charge and attachment on property - recovery of alleged dues of erstwhile owner of the property - HELD THAT:- It is clear that the respondents were directed to withdraw the charge and the attachment on the property, located at Plot No.4/C, Block No.211, Survey No.133/2, Village Karanj, Taluka Mandvi, District Surat, in respect of alleged dues of the erstwhile owner of the property namely Varun Filaments Private Limited under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. However, the grievance voiced by the writ-applicant in the present Writ-Application is that till this date, directions issued by this Court, have not been complied with. One last opportunity is granted to the respondent No.2 to comply with the directions, issued by this Court - application disposed off. Issues: Compliance with Court's Order for Withdrawal of Charge and Attachment on PropertyComprehensive Analysis:Issue 1: Compliance with Court's OrderIn this case, the writ-applicants sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to withdraw the charge and attachment on a specific property in compliance with a previous judgment. The Court noted that a previous order had directed the withdrawal of the charge and attachment on the property due to alleged dues of the erstwhile owner under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003. However, the writ-applicants contended that the directions had not been followed by the respondents until that date. The Court gave a final opportunity for compliance, setting a deadline of four weeks for the respondents to adhere to the directions issued in the previous judgment.Issue 2: Relief SoughtThe writ-applicants requested various reliefs, including the withdrawal of the charge and attachment on the property, pending notice, admission, and final hearing of the petition. They also sought ex parte ad interim relief, costs of the petition to be paid by the respondents, and any further relief deemed fit by the Court in the interest of justice. The Court's focus was primarily on ensuring compliance with the previous order directing the withdrawal of the charge and attachment on the property.ConclusionThe Court's judgment primarily revolved around ensuring compliance with its previous order regarding the withdrawal of the charge and attachment on the property in question. By giving a final opportunity for compliance within a specified timeframe, the Court aimed to enforce its directives effectively. The writ-application was disposed of, emphasizing the importance of adhering to court orders and directions.