Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order was liable to be quashed for violation of the principles of natural justice, and whether the matter required fresh consideration after affording a proper hearing.
Analysis: The order under challenge did not assign any reasons. The record also showed that no opportunity of hearing had been afforded to the writ petitioner before passing the order. In these circumstances, the decision-making process was found to suffer from gross breach of natural justice. The matter was therefore required to be reopened and decided afresh after granting the petitioner an opportunity to appear, place additional material on record if necessary, and receive a reasoned order.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed and the proceedings were remitted to the appropriate authority for fresh adjudication after due hearing.