Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether security deposit could be demanded for amending a transporter's registration certificate by adding a new go-down, by treating that go-down as a branch office under the relevant registration framework.
Analysis: Section 22 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act governs registration of transporters, while Rule 17 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 requires disclosure of the head office, branch offices and go-downs in the registration process. The memorandum dated 20th July, 2015 prescribed security deposit for transporters and for branch offices, but specifically provided nil security for amendment of registration other than inclusion of a branch office. The later memorandum superseded the earlier memorandum dated 17th November, 2011. The record showed that the petitioner sought only inclusion of an additional go-down as a delivery point, and there was no material to show that the premises was intended to function as a branch office. The distinction between a branch office and a go-down was therefore material, and the demand proceeded on an legal premise.
Conclusion: The demand for security deposit was impermissible, and the communication insisting on such deposit for amendment of registration by inclusion of the go-down was set aside.