Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether lease rent derived from letting out the assessee-company's plant and machinery during the relevant assessment years was taxable as profits and gains of business or as income from other sources.
Analysis: The assessee-company had stopped manufacturing because of severe financial difficulty, but the assets were let out only temporarily under a court-approved scheme to preserve the business and liquidate liabilities. The plant and machinery continued to retain the character of commercial assets because there was no intention to permanently discontinue the business. Income earned from the temporary exploitation of such business assets remained business income, even though the assets were used by another entity to carry on the same kind of manufacturing activity. On that footing, the brought-forward business losses were capable of adjustment under the set-off and carry-forward provisions.
Conclusion: The lease rent was assessable under the head profits and gains of business, not income from other sources, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: Temporary letting of commercial assets without an intention to permanently abandon the business does not change the character of the income from business income to income from other sources.
Ratio Decidendi: Where business assets are only temporarily let out as commercial assets without permanent cessation of the business, the income derived from such exploitation retains the character of business income.