TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT rules interest expense justified when loan used to repay directors.</h1> <h3>M/s. Dream Flats Pvt. Ltd. Versus The DCIT, Circle-6, Jaipur.</h3> M/s. Dream Flats Pvt. Ltd. Versus The DCIT, Circle-6, Jaipur. - TMI Issues:Challenging reassessment order passed under section 147 of the IT Act.Disallowance of interest under section 24(b) of the IT Act.Analysis:1. Challenging reassessment order: The assessee challenged the reassessment order passed under section 147 of the IT Act. The first ground raised was regarding the confirmation of the action of the AO in passing the order under section 143(3)/147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee did not press this ground before the ITAT, and it was dismissed for not being pressed.2. Disallowance of interest under section 24(b): The second ground was related to the disallowance of interest under section 24(b) of the IT Act. The AO disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee on account of interest on borrowed capital, as the borrowed fund was not utilized for acquiring the house property against which the deduction was claimed. The AO found that a portion of the loan amount was not utilized for loan repayment but for excess payment to some Directors, leading to a proportionate disallowance of the interest deduction. The CIT (A) upheld this disallowance, stating that certain amounts were utilized for excess payments to Directors. However, the ITAT found discrepancies in the AO's calculations and noted that the accounts were settled before the end of the financial year 2007-08. As the entire loan amount from ICICI Bank was utilized for repayment of loans from Directors, no disallowance on interest expenditure for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2012-13 was warranted. Consequently, the ITAT deleted the disallowance made by the AO under section 24(b) of the Act for both assessment years.In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee, emphasizing that the disallowance of interest expenditure under section 24(b) was unjustified given the utilization of the loan from ICICI Bank for repayment of loans from Directors before the end of the financial year 2007-08.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
