Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondents were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/2004 despite producing the transporter declarations belatedly.
Analysis: The respondents had discharged service tax as deemed service providers on goods transport agency services under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act. The benefit of Notification No. 32/2004 was conditional on production of declarations from the transporters that they had not availed Cenvat credit on inputs or capital goods. Although the declarations were not produced at the time of availing the benefit, they were produced before the Commissioner (Appeals), who treated the condition as having been substantially fulfilled. No material reason was shown to disturb that finding.
Conclusion: The respondents were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/2004 and the Department's challenge failed.