TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SEBI Circular Violations Appeal: Penalties Reduced for Unauthorized Fund Transfers</h1> The appellant was penalized for violating SEBI circulars related to client fund segregation and unauthorized fund transfers between securities and ... Segregation of the funds and securities of client - Regulation Of Transactions Between Clients And Brokers - violation of SEBI circulars dated November 18, 1993 and August 27, 2003 - Penalty imposed - HELD THAT:- There is no violation of circular dated November 18, 1993. The circular itself, inter-alia, provides that withdrawal of money on client authority is permissible. In the present case, money was transferred from the client's accounts to his own account in the commodities market on client's letter of authority. This is against the guidelines provided in the circular dated November 18, 1993 itself, therefore, the order, to that extent is required to be set aside. Transactions allegedly carried out by the appellant contrary to the directions contained in SEBI circular No. MRD/SE/Cir-33/2003/27/08 of August 27, 2003 - The submission that the money was withdrawn from one account and credited to another account was on the strength of the letter of authority from the respective client cannot be accepted so far as the present circular is concerned. In our view, the appellant had committed breach of the directions contained in the said circular. Considering the fact that though none of the prescribed mode of cash transfer was adopted by the appellant as provided by the circular, nonetheless, there was no cash handling in any of the transactions. Considering all these facts on the record, in our view, a penalty of ₹ 5 lacs would be fair. Issues Involved:1. Violation of SEBI circulars dated November 18, 1993, and August 27, 2003, regarding segregation of client funds and securities.2. Unauthorized transfer of funds between securities and commodities accounts.3. Imposition of penalties on brokers for non-compliance with SEBI regulations.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Violation of SEBI Circulars (Appeal No. 10 of 2016):A penalty of Rs. 30 lacs was imposed on the appellant for violating SEBI circulars regarding the segregation of client funds and securities. The SEBI circular dated November 18, 1993, mandates that no money shall be paid into the client's account other than specific conditions and no money shall be withdrawn from the client's account except under certain conditions. The circular dated August 27, 2003, reiterates that brokers should not accept cash from clients and all transactions should be through account payee crossed cheques, demand drafts, or direct credit into the bank account.During the inspection, it was found that the appellant transferred Rs. 220 crores between its securities and commodities group companies, with Rs. 119 crores transferred from the client's bank account to the commodities company. The appellant argued that these transfers were made with the client's consent to facilitate transactions across segments. However, SEBI found these transactions in violation of the circulars and imposed a penalty. The Tribunal found no violation of the November 18, 1993, circular, as the transfers were made on the client's authority. However, the Tribunal upheld the violation of the August 27, 2003, circular, as the transactions did not follow the prescribed modes of payment. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 5 lacs.2. Unauthorized Transfer of Funds (Appeal No. 29 of 2016):SEBI found that the appellant made 65 payments amounting to Rs. 36,94,510.34 from the client's bank accounts to its group company dealing in commodities without proper authorization. In some instances, the appellant did not obtain authorization for amounts less than Rs. 5,000, and in other cases, there was no authorization for amounts exceeding Rs. 5,000. The appellant argued that the amounts were meager and there were no complaints from clients. The Tribunal found the penalty of Rs. 20 lacs disproportionate and reduced it to Rs. 10 lacs.3. Imposition of Penalties for Non-Compliance (Appeal No. 196 of 2016):A penalty of Rs. 16 lacs and Rs. 8 lacs was imposed on the appellant for non-compliance with SEBI circulars and the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. SEBI noted three irregularities: intermingling of funds between securities and commodities client bank accounts, using credit fund balances for purposes other than specified in the circulars, and not mentioning 'Client Account' in the bank account name. The appellant admitted to transferring funds between accounts but argued that these were exceptional incidents. The Tribunal found that the appellant violated the circulars, but no quantifiable figures showed unfair advantage or monetary loss to investors. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 12 lacs.Order:1. Appeal No. 10 of 2016: The order holding the appellant liable for violating the November 18, 1993, circular is set aside. The violation of the August 27, 2003, circular is confirmed, and the penalty is reduced to Rs. 5 lacs.2. Appeal No. 29 of 2016: The penalty is reduced from Rs. 20 lacs to Rs. 10 lacs.3. Appeal No. 196 of 2016: The total penalty is reduced from Rs. 24 lacs to Rs. 12 lacs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
