Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal partially allowed, penalties reduced under Section 112(a), upheld confiscation & redemption fine. Misdeclaration & classification issues key.</h1> The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) while upholding the confiscation of goods and the redemption ... Classification of imported goods - nature of scrap - Shredded Aluminium 6063 Extrusion Scrap “Tread” - As against declaration of shredded Aluminium scrap the goods found appeared to be remnant ends of ingots/ billets obtained during the extrusion process - HELD THAT:- We have perused the panchnama dated 19.02.2009, wherein the goods have been described as “The cargo was mainly consisted of oval and cylindrical pieces of aluminium alloy. The thickness of the said pieces varied from approximately 2” to 21/4’ (feet) and the diameter varied from 6” (inches) to 1’ (feet).” From the examination conducted as per the above said panchnama, we have no hesitation in holding that the goods imported goods were not “shredded aluminium scrap” as declared by the appellants. We agree with the findings recorded by the Commissioner that imported goods have been misdeclared in terms of description and hence are liable for confiscation under Section 111 (d) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962 - the order of Commissioner confiscating the goods is upheld and goods allowed to be redeemed on the payment of redemption fine - Looking into the total assessable value declared, i.e. ₹ 41,89,569.89/- by the appellants, the redemption fine of ₹ 7,00,000/- is not found to be excessive and is upheld. Penalty - HELD THAT:- For the act of omission and commission leading to misdeclaration of goods and there confiscation, under Section 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962, appellants have been held liable to penalty under Section 112(a) of Customs Act, 1962. Commissioner has imposed penalty of ₹ 3,00,000/- - the ends of justice will be met if the penalty is reduced to ₹ 2,00,000/-. Appeal allowed in part. Issues:Classification of imported goods under CTH 76020090, confiscation under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, imposition of a fine for redemption, imposition of penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.Classification of Imported Goods:The appellants imported goods declared as 'Shredded Aluminium 6063 Extrusion Scrap 'Tread''. However, upon examination, the goods were found to be cylindrical and oval pieces of aluminum alloy, not matching the declared description. The goods were considered to be remnant ends of ingots/billets from the extrusion process, more appropriately falling under the description of 'Tata' as per the ISRI Scrap Circular. The Commissioner concluded that the goods were misdeclared, leading to confiscation under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962.Nature of Scrap:The dispute centered around the nature of the imported goods, with the appellants arguing that the goods were scrap and citing previous decisions to support their claim. The revenue contended that the goods did not match the declared description and were misdeclared, leading to the confiscation order. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner's findings that the imported goods were misdeclared and upheld the confiscation order.Penalty Imposition:The appellants were held liable for penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, for the misdeclaration of goods and their confiscation. The Commissioner imposed a penalty of &8377; 3,00,000, which the Tribunal deemed excessive. The Tribunal reduced the penalty to &8377; 2,00,000, stating that it would meet the ends of justice. The rest of the impugned order was upheld except for this modification.In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) while upholding the confiscation of goods and the redemption fine. The decision was based on the misdeclaration of imported goods, their classification under a different category than declared, and the corresponding penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found