TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Admits Financial Creditor's Insolvency Application: Corporate Debtor Enters Resolution Process</h1> <h3>Indiabulls Consumer Finance Ltd. Versus Aawrun Furnishings Man-tra (P.) Ltd.</h3> Indiabulls Consumer Finance Ltd. Versus Aawrun Furnishings Man-tra (P.) Ltd. - TMI Issues Involved:Application under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process due to default in loan repayment.Analysis:The Financial Creditor filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting on a loan of Rs. 40 lakhs, with the last default occurring on 05.03.2019. The loan agreement allowed the Financial Creditor to recall the loan in case of default, leading to the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor admitted the debt and default but claimed to have requested loan restructuring, which was not accepted by the Financial Creditor.The Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor acknowledged the debt and default, making them eligible for admission into CIRP under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The application was deemed defect-free, leading to the admission of the application by the Financial Creditor. Consequently, the Tribunal issued orders for the declaration of moratorium, public announcement, and appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) to manage the resolution process.The moratorium declared under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibited various actions against the Corporate Debtor, including legal proceedings, asset transfers, and recovery actions. Essential goods or services supply to the Corporate Debtor was to continue uninterrupted during the moratorium period. The order specified the effect of moratorium till the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process, with provisions for its cessation upon approval of a resolution plan or liquidation order.Additionally, the order appointed Mr. Shashi Agarwal as the Interim Resolution Professional, with specific details of his appointment and responsibilities outlined. The Financial Creditor was directed to pay advance fees to the IRP, and the Resolution Professional was mandated to conduct the CIRP in a time-bound manner as per regulations. The Registry was instructed to communicate the order to all relevant parties, with a progress report filing scheduled for a future date.In conclusion, the judgment detailed the admission of the application under Section 7, the implications of the moratorium, the appointment of the IRP, and the procedural requirements for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
TaxTMI 