Tribunal rules in favor of assessee on tax treatment of Fixed Deposits from RGGVY scheme

The Tribunal upheld the deletions of additional depreciation and ERPC charges, along with the disallowance under section 14A. It ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the interest on Fixed Deposits from the RGGVY scheme, stating it was not taxable income as it was meant for project costs under the scheme with an overriding title in favor of the Government of India. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decisions supported by judicial precedents and the terms of the RGGVY scheme.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Deletion of additions on account of additional depreciation.
2. Deletion of additions on account of ERPC charges.
3. Deletion of disallowance under section 14A.
4. Addition on account of interest on Fixed Deposits from capital subsidy received under Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojana (RGGVY).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Additional Depreciation:

The Revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 77,78,79,369/- on account of additional depreciation. The Tribunal upheld the deletion, referencing its prior decisions in the assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2010-11 and 2011-12. The Tribunal reiterated that the generation of electricity is akin to manufacturing a new product and thus qualifies for additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia). This conclusion was supported by various judicial pronouncements, including the Hon’ble Supreme Court and several High Courts, affirming that electricity generation is a manufacturing activity eligible for additional depreciation.

2. ERPC Charges:

The Revenue contested the deletion of Rs. 15,00,000/- on account of ERPC charges. The Tribunal maintained the deletion, citing its previous rulings in the assessee’s cases for A.Y. 2010-11 and 2011-12. It was noted that the Assessing Officer’s disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source was previously overturned by the Tribunal, which found that the payments were not subject to TDS provisions.

3. Disallowance under Section 14A:

The Tribunal upheld the deletion of Rs. 97,37,654/- disallowed under section 14A. It reiterated its stance from the assessee’s cases for A.Y. 2010-11 and 2011-12, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer failed to record dissatisfaction with the assessee's claim of no expenditure incurred to earn the exempt income before invoking Rule 8D. Consequently, the disallowance under section 14A was deemed unsustainable.

4. Interest on Fixed Deposits from Capital Subsidy (RGGVY):

The assessee’s appeal involved the addition of Rs. 21,48,33,731/- as interest on Fixed Deposits from capital subsidy under RGGVY. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the interest earned on deposits was not the assessee’s income but was meant for project costs under the scheme. The Tribunal noted that the funds were to be used exclusively for the project, and any unutilized funds were to be kept in bank deposits with the interest being accounted for and adjusted against the last installment of capital subsidy. The Tribunal concluded that the interest was diverted at inception by an overriding title in favor of the Government of India and thus did not constitute taxable income for the assessee.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and allowed the assessee’s appeal, concluding that the deletions and disallowances made by the CIT(A) were justified and supported by prior judicial decisions and the specific terms of the RGGVY scheme. The interest on Fixed Deposits was deemed not to be the assessee’s income due to the overriding title of the Government of India.

---