1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petitions and disposes pending applications. Justices Nariman and Bhat presided.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions and disposed of pending applications in a case presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali ... Validity of Declaration made under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 (βIDSβ) - whether such declaration to be void for being in contravention of Section 193 of the FA, 2016 - as per petitioner no prior notice was issued to either of the Petitioners before passing the impugned order rejecting the declarations of undisclosed income under the IDA scheme - HELD THAT:- Special Leave Petitions are dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, and pending applications were disposed of. The citation is 2019 (12) TMI 88 - SC Order. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat were involved in the judgment. Key lawyers included Mr. Mukul Rohatgi and Mr. Arijit Prasad.