Tribunal overturns disallowance of claimed loss in export context due to global downturn

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the disallowance of a claimed loss of Rs. 2,23,07,082/- due to the rejection of goods exported in the context of a global economic downturn. The Tribunal found the loss substantiated by documentary evidence and RBI approval for writing off the unrealized export bill, setting aside the lower authorities' decisions and dismissing the general ground of appeal. The decision was made on 22.10.2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of claim of loss due to rejection of goods.
2. Consideration of the alternate plea for allowing the claim of loss as bad debts.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Claim of Loss Due to Rejection of Goods:

The assessee, engaged in the business of import and export of iron and steel, filed its return of income for A.Y. 2010-11, declaring a total income of Rs. 17,84,45,960/-. During assessment, the Assessing Officer (A.O) observed a claimed loss of Rs. 2,23,07,082/- due to rejection of goods. The loss stemmed from the rejection of 515.864 MT of Hot rolled Steel Wire Rods exported to M/s Ammetal FZCO, UAE, in the preceding year. The assessee contended that due to the 2008 worldwide economic crisis, steel prices plummeted, leading the importer to reject the goods. The goods were subsequently sold in Dubai at a significantly lower price, resulting in the claimed loss. The A.O disallowed the loss, citing reasons such as lack of third-party authentication of correspondence, absence of supporting documents for sale proceeds realization, and non-inclusion of returned goods in the closing inventory.

Upon appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the A.O's decision. However, the Tribunal, after reviewing the facts and documentary evidence, including correspondence with the importer and approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for writing off the unrealized export bill, found the assessee's claim substantiated. The Tribunal noted that the loss was incurred in the normal course of business due to the global economic downturn and the commercial impracticality of returning the goods to India. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the claim of loss, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and deleting the disallowance of Rs. 2,23,07,082/-.

2. Consideration of the Alternate Plea for Allowing the Claim of Loss as Bad Debts:

The assessee's alternate plea was that if the loss due to rejection of goods was not allowed, it should be considered as bad debts. However, since the Tribunal allowed the claim of loss on the primary ground, the alternate plea was not deliberated further.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the lower authorities erred in disallowing the loss claimed by the assessee due to the rejection of goods. The loss was substantiated by documentary evidence and approved by the RBI for writing off the unrealized export bill. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 2,23,07,082/- and dismissing the general ground of appeal as not pressed. The appeal was pronounced in the open court on 22.10.2019.

---